http://www.reformer.com/localnews/ci_22336784/biomass-project-moving-forward
Springfield biomass project moving forward
By HOWARD WEISS-TISMAN / Brattleboro Reformer Staffreformer.com
Posted: 01/09/2013 03:00:00 AM EST
January 9, 2013 12:29 PM GMT
Wednesday January 9, 2013
WESTMINSTER -- As developers for a proposed North Springfield biomass energy plant continue working to get their permits, a Windham County resident says the proposed project will have effects far beyond it's location in Windsor County.
Winstanley Enterprises LLC and Weston Solutions Inc. want to build a 35 megawatt wood chip fueled power plant on a 20 acre parcel at 36 Precision Drive in North Springfield.
If the plant is built it will burn wood chips to produce electricity which developers say could power all of the homes in Windsor County.
Developers are working their way through the Certificate of Public Good process with the Public Service Board. The PSB is collecting information until Jan. 11 and will open hearings soon after that.
Developers hope to break ground in the summer.
On Saturday, Jan. 12 at 1 p.m. the North Springfield Action Group, a group opposed to the project, will hold an informational gathering at 871 French Meadow Road, which is near the proposed plant.
Jan Ameen, who lives in Westminster, said residents in Windham County, and around Vermont, should be paying close attention to the project.
"If this plant is built there will be significant environmental and economic impacts for everyone, not just for Springfield," Ameen said. "It could create health issues for the people of WIndham County as well. We all know that air pollution does not stay in one place."
If it is built,
Advertisement
the North Springfield Sustainable Energy Project, or NSSEP, will have a 140 foot tall exhaust stack and the plant is expected to burn up to 420,500 tons of forest biomass per year.
Ameen said emissions from the plant would travel across the region, threatening the environment and people's health
"Overall it would produce more greenhouse gases than a coal plant," Ameen said. "People accept woodstoves, but this is on a much larger scale. It really magnifies the pollution."
Dan Ingold of Weston Solutions, the senior technical director of the project, said NSSEP already has its draft air permit from the state.
He said the plant will have all of the most modern filters in place and once the plant is operational its impact on air quality will be far less than an equivalent coal fired plant that produces the same amount of electricity.
"Vermont has the toughest air quality standards in the nation and we meet and exceed all state and federal rules and regulations," he said.
Ingold lives in Guilford, and he said he got involved with the project after learning how it would help the state move ahead on its plan to create more of its energy in state.
Ameen also said that the plant would drive up the cost of cord wood, adding that many low income Vermonters rely on local wood to heat their homes. Ameen said the plant could use up to 550 cords a day, which would eventually affect the availability and cost of wood in the region.
And she said as the plant brings in wood from out of state there will be a greater potential to introduce invasive insects into Vermont.
"This is not a wood stove we are talking about in winter," Ameen said. "This would operate every day, every year for decades. There are a whole host of issues here. Everyone in the state should be concerned about this."
She also said the plant uses a lot of water and she said the ash from the plant would include toxins from the dirty wood that she says will inevitably be included in what the plant burns.
"This is not an intelligent use of resources," Ameen said. "It's a way for a company to make money and create environmental damage."
According to Ingold, the company has been working with its neighbors from the start and the proposed plant provides benefits far beyond producing energy from a local wood product.
Excess hot water will be offered at reduced rates which Ingold said would spur development in the area, and the extra heat might also be used for a new residential heating district which would also help the local tax base.
"This is a great opportunity for Vermont to take responsibility for its own energy generation," Ingold said. "It's cleaner than fossil fuels and it's half the cost. There is a lot of misinformation out there and we are trying to make sure people get the whole story."
Great!! Hope the project keeps moving forward towards operation!!!
ReplyDeleteYes, hope it keeps moving forward. Springfield needs this, the region needs this.
ReplyDeleteSpringfield Medical Care Systems (SMCS) became a tobacco-free organization. There will be no smoking or tobacco use allowed on any property owned or leased by SMCS, including Springfield Hospital buildings and all grounds and parking areas.
ReplyDelete“This new policy reflects our continued commitment to provide the best possible care to our patients and their families,” says Glenn Cordner, Chief Executive Officer. “Tobacco use in and around SMCS poses health and safety risks for our patients and their families, as well as our staff.
Surprisingly it appears that Springfield Medical Care Systems is afraid to make the same statement concerning the negative impact of the proposed North Springfield biomass energy plant on the health of their patients and employees. The silence is deafening and apparently the greed of the staff is overwhelming. Perhaps their thinking is that the more sick patients from pollution equals more fees for the docs and staff? An annuity for the town's medical profession and a life sentence or worse for their patients?
When did Fletcher Allen Health Care make their statement concerning the negative impact of the Mcneill Biomass Plant?
Delete@5:38 You're 100% correct and I totally agree.
DeleteLet's run that damn hospital out of town!
you're not so far off; this hospital has all the docs signed on and dictates procedure (ie, 10 min allowed for patient visits); and local pharmacies are also joining--this practice used to be considered a MONOPOLY; patients have no place to go to get away from the hospital tentacles unless they go out of town. Anyone having the misfortune to go into this new medical center learns that the place is definitely not set up for patient convenience. I, for one, am sick of being told "now that Splfd is part of this rural health compact we have to ..." give up our right to what tests and how many visits we are required to make: twice as many visits as required before this "compact" paid for extra visits and if I prefer to go back to the two visits per year, I am threatened with denial of my medicines. It is all for money and not for patient care!!!!!
DeleteAnonymous, @ 9:54: It's not the hospital dictating the procedure time; it's the insurers. If you've seen the movie SiCKO, you saw how insurance companies consider any payout for patient service to be a "medical loss." Since they consider their customer to be their "shareholders" (i.e., the executives are by contract shareholders too), any such payment for actual medical care is a waste of money.
DeleteTherefore, THEY state how much they will pay for a doctor to consult with a patient. Ten minutes is generous-- my doctor was paid for seven minutes!
So, you should look forward to Green Mountain Care's implementation of a single payer system, starting (with any luck) in 2017-- If the lobbyists for BCBS and CIGNA don't screw it up, here's what it'll be:
1. Every single medical and health care provider will know what they are going to get for income for the contract period (probably 1 or 2 years).
2. As a result, they will not have to advertise. They won't make more money by attracting more patients.
3. If they have seen you once for your condition, they will be able to answer your questions over the phone rather than forcing you to make an appointment in order for them to collect money for the service.
4. They won't get calls from Green Mountain Care telling them they've been treating you for too long. (This is what happens with the insurers righ now.)
5. You will probably have a co-payment to make, but they will never bounce a bill back to you. The co-payment will be low enough that you will not postpone seeing the doctor when you are sick or injured.
6. They will determine what tests you need, and they will see that they are available to you. They will not prescribe unnecessary tests because it won't generate more money for the insurance company. When you need referrals to a specialist or a top-flight clinic (e.g., Mayo), it's automatically covered.
7. Since the state would negotiate prescription prices, you would pay a flat rate for all prescriptions, from aspirin to anti-cancer medications.
8. And if you lose your job, your coverage remains the same for the entire family.
The beauty part is that under such a system-- universal, affordable, transparent in operation (because government records are public records), equitable for all and available to the degree you want to use it (i.e, participatory)-- will actually cost one-third LESS than the for-profit system which at this time only covers about one-half of Vermonters adequately.
So, don't hold a grudge against the hospital or its financial system. They are looking just as much as you are to have a system that gives you what the doctor wants to order. And that includes chatting with you as much as the two of you feel is necessary.
Chuckles the Clown......don't you ever, ever get anything right? Comments were made as to why the Springfield Medical Care Systems is strangely silent about the well known negative impact of the North Springfield Biomess plant on the health of the residents of Springfield and you take us down a nonsense road blah blahing about obscure and meaningless idiotic facts that have absolutely nothing to do with the damage that residents will incur from the biomess plant. Are you really that daft or are you purposely constantly trying to disrupt meaningful conversations with your never ending drivel?
DeleteMy 8:13 response was made to the comments in the entry immediately above my reply. Are you referring to someone else's comment made at some other time?
DeleteIf you think SMCS is a monopoly I would love to hear your thoughts on DHMC.
ReplyDeleteDo your realize it is the insurance companies and medicaid/medicare that is dictating patient care?
its all about money. 1 dose of radiation=30000. 15 minutes none the less. 8 a day 5 days a week. do the math.
ReplyDeleteWhat a great idea; let's run that damn hospital out of town so we can travel miles to the nearest ER/hospital
ReplyDeleteSo you claim the biomass plant will cause health problems, and your suggestion is to run the hospital out of town. Your conclusions sound Iron clad. Are there any seats still vacant on the crazy train?
ReplyDeleteYes there are.
DeletePlease watch your step upon boarding.
ALL ABOARD!!!!!
Why not talk about the recent MRSA outbreak at Springfield Hospital, probably sending more employees to Smiling Steves for drugs than patients.
ReplyDeletea no media coverage MRSA scare ?
Deletewho can you trust around here ?