Wednesday, January 9, 2013

North Springfield biomass project moving forward

As developers for a proposed North Springfield biomass energy plant continue working to get their permits, a Windham County resident says the proposed project will have effects far beyond it's location in Windsor County.
http://www.reformer.com/localnews/ci_22336784/biomass-project-moving-forward

16 comments :

  1. BIO MASS? YES PLEASE!!!1/9/13, 2:06 PM

    Great!! Hope the project keeps moving forward towards operation!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, hope it keeps moving forward. Springfield needs this, the region needs this.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Springfield Medical Care Systems (SMCS) became a tobacco-free organization. There will be no smoking or tobacco use allowed on any property owned or leased by SMCS, including Springfield Hospital buildings and all grounds and parking areas.

    “This new policy reflects our continued commitment to provide the best possible care to our patients and their families,” says Glenn Cordner, Chief Executive Officer. “Tobacco use in and around SMCS poses health and safety risks for our patients and their families, as well as our staff.

    Surprisingly it appears that Springfield Medical Care Systems is afraid to make the same statement concerning the negative impact of the proposed North Springfield biomass energy plant on the health of their patients and employees. The silence is deafening and apparently the greed of the staff is overwhelming. Perhaps their thinking is that the more sick patients from pollution equals more fees for the docs and staff? An annuity for the town's medical profession and a life sentence or worse for their patients?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. When did Fletcher Allen Health Care make their statement concerning the negative impact of the Mcneill Biomass Plant?

      Delete
    2. Old n' Smolderin'1/9/13, 7:06 PM

      @5:38 You're 100% correct and I totally agree.
      Let's run that damn hospital out of town!

      Delete
    3. you're not so far off; this hospital has all the docs signed on and dictates procedure (ie, 10 min allowed for patient visits); and local pharmacies are also joining--this practice used to be considered a MONOPOLY; patients have no place to go to get away from the hospital tentacles unless they go out of town. Anyone having the misfortune to go into this new medical center learns that the place is definitely not set up for patient convenience. I, for one, am sick of being told "now that Splfd is part of this rural health compact we have to ..." give up our right to what tests and how many visits we are required to make: twice as many visits as required before this "compact" paid for extra visits and if I prefer to go back to the two visits per year, I am threatened with denial of my medicines. It is all for money and not for patient care!!!!!

      Delete
    4. chuck gregory1/12/13, 8:13 PM

      Anonymous, @ 9:54: It's not the hospital dictating the procedure time; it's the insurers. If you've seen the movie SiCKO, you saw how insurance companies consider any payout for patient service to be a "medical loss." Since they consider their customer to be their "shareholders" (i.e., the executives are by contract shareholders too), any such payment for actual medical care is a waste of money.

      Therefore, THEY state how much they will pay for a doctor to consult with a patient. Ten minutes is generous-- my doctor was paid for seven minutes!

      So, you should look forward to Green Mountain Care's implementation of a single payer system, starting (with any luck) in 2017-- If the lobbyists for BCBS and CIGNA don't screw it up, here's what it'll be:

      1. Every single medical and health care provider will know what they are going to get for income for the contract period (probably 1 or 2 years).
      2. As a result, they will not have to advertise. They won't make more money by attracting more patients.
      3. If they have seen you once for your condition, they will be able to answer your questions over the phone rather than forcing you to make an appointment in order for them to collect money for the service.
      4. They won't get calls from Green Mountain Care telling them they've been treating you for too long. (This is what happens with the insurers righ now.)
      5. You will probably have a co-payment to make, but they will never bounce a bill back to you. The co-payment will be low enough that you will not postpone seeing the doctor when you are sick or injured.
      6. They will determine what tests you need, and they will see that they are available to you. They will not prescribe unnecessary tests because it won't generate more money for the insurance company. When you need referrals to a specialist or a top-flight clinic (e.g., Mayo), it's automatically covered.
      7. Since the state would negotiate prescription prices, you would pay a flat rate for all prescriptions, from aspirin to anti-cancer medications.
      8. And if you lose your job, your coverage remains the same for the entire family.

      The beauty part is that under such a system-- universal, affordable, transparent in operation (because government records are public records), equitable for all and available to the degree you want to use it (i.e, participatory)-- will actually cost one-third LESS than the for-profit system which at this time only covers about one-half of Vermonters adequately.

      So, don't hold a grudge against the hospital or its financial system. They are looking just as much as you are to have a system that gives you what the doctor wants to order. And that includes chatting with you as much as the two of you feel is necessary.

      Delete
    5. Chuckles the Clown......don't you ever, ever get anything right? Comments were made as to why the Springfield Medical Care Systems is strangely silent about the well known negative impact of the North Springfield Biomess plant on the health of the residents of Springfield and you take us down a nonsense road blah blahing about obscure and meaningless idiotic facts that have absolutely nothing to do with the damage that residents will incur from the biomess plant. Are you really that daft or are you purposely constantly trying to disrupt meaningful conversations with your never ending drivel?

      Delete
    6. chuck gregory1/13/13, 4:38 PM

      My 8:13 response was made to the comments in the entry immediately above my reply. Are you referring to someone else's comment made at some other time?

      Delete
  4. If you think SMCS is a monopoly I would love to hear your thoughts on DHMC.

    Do your realize it is the insurance companies and medicaid/medicare that is dictating patient care?

    ReplyDelete
  5. its all about money. 1 dose of radiation=30000. 15 minutes none the less. 8 a day 5 days a week. do the math.

    ReplyDelete
  6. What a great idea; let's run that damn hospital out of town so we can travel miles to the nearest ER/hospital

    ReplyDelete
  7. So you claim the biomass plant will cause health problems, and your suggestion is to run the hospital out of town. Your conclusions sound Iron clad. Are there any seats still vacant on the crazy train?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The Conductor1/11/13, 6:28 PM

      Yes there are.
      Please watch your step upon boarding.

      ALL ABOARD!!!!!

      Delete
  8. Why not talk about the recent MRSA outbreak at Springfield Hospital, probably sending more employees to Smiling Steves for drugs than patients.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a no media coverage MRSA scare ?

      who can you trust around here ?

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts