Friday, April 26, 2013

Lawyers appeal Bolaski's second degree murder conviction at Supreme Court

Lawyers appeal Bolaski's second degree murder conviction and want a new trial.


http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130426/NEWS02/704269878

25 comments :

  1. He shot a man in the back!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bad pennies keep turning up. This is why when you convict someone of cold-blooded murder that you should fry them instead of locking them up and letting their high paid lawyers clog the court system with nonsense for years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory4/27/13, 6:49 AM

      Actually, it costs a lot more to execute a person than to give them a life sentence. Well, that is, if you respect their Constitutional right to defend themselves.

      And I think that any prisoner who appeals his sentence is proving that he is indeed getting punished-- he clearly dislikes incarceration so much that he's doing everything he can to get out. The ones who escape punishment are the ones like Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bomber, for you youngsters), who refused to appeal his death sentence, and Gary Gilmore, the Utah convict who asked to be executed instead of given a life sentence.

      Delete
    2. To die is to escape punishment?
      Thats the ultimate punishment.

      Delete
    3. How can it cost more to execute someone with a bullet then feed them 3 meals a day?
      Personally I think to stop people from committing acts of violence that lands them in jail for life they need to execute them. There would be less prison guards, less food, less electricity and less taxes spent. If someone is in jail for life with no chance of parole then it should be done.
      It might make would be criminals think twice about committing crimes that land them in jail for life. Be more like Texas, if you kill someone in their state they will kill you back, quickly.

      Delete
    4. chuck gregory4/27/13, 4:46 PM

      Under our legal system, prisoners are entitled to the fullest possible defense against capital punishment. It might take three years for just one appeal to be overruled in court, another two years for it to be overruled in appeals court, and five years to be heard at the Supreme Court level. Meanwhile, the charge meter is ticking at both the prosecutor's and defender's law offices. you could look it up.

      The punishments imposed by law are in part intended to deter future criminality and in part to ease the victims' needs for revenge and restitution. As 9:00 AM points out, sometimes the victims don't even get that with a death sentence. It would have been interesting to see how Cobb would have commented about his victim after being in the slammer for 60 more years.

      Delete
    5. Chuck , The father in the 9:00 sounded like he wanted the guy shot or to actually feel some pain. Instead he was just put down like a sick animal.
      Either way he is dead and that should be a little message to those that want to commit crimes.
      Thank you justice system for no rehab for this guy.

      Delete
  3. Actually it costs a lot less to execute a man than to give them a life sentence.
    The cost of the electrity (which could be solar derived making it a "green" execution) is very little.
    The cost of the appeals(caused by bleeding heart libs)is the costly part.
    Its much better to rehab a convicted killer than keep them in jail....tell that to the any victims family Chuck and see what happens.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This is a excerpt from The New York Daily News.
    Very interesting comments and story.
    The link to the full story is below.
    ............The father, stepmother and stepbrother of the man shot and killed by Cobb were among the witnesses. Also in the viewing area was one of the women who was shot and attacked but survived to testify against Cobb.

    "I think justice was served but it doesn't change anything to speak of," the slain man's father, Don Vandever, said after watching Cobb die. "I do think the justice system needs to be more of a deterrent.

    "All he did was go to sleep. That's it."

    Nikki Daniels, 29, who was raped and shot during the 2002 attack but survived to testify against Cobb, said, "I thought he was going to be remorseful, I thought he was going to be apologetic, was hoping that he was going to address me.

    "I saw the same evil person I saw 11 years ago. ... He definitely showed his true colors."


    Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/texas-murderer-cracks-sarcastic-jokes-execution-article-1.1328201#ixzz2RfT6fNVB

    ReplyDelete
  5. What a load of bull!! Kyle is getting what he deserved. Whether Vinnie though about suicide or not should not matter. That should not have been Kyle Bolaski's choice to make.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Sorry Kyle ,you lost any credibility when you shot a man in the back,whether or not you felt threatened earlier he was obviously retreating and you shot him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Prosecutor John Lavoie engaged in misconduct, regardless of the facts, a new trial should be granted based upon prosecutorial misconduct alone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory6/2/13, 10:15 AM

      And what are the facts to support your charge?

      Delete
  8. Here's the latest filing in the Vermont Supreme Court,

    The trial judge Zimmerman is an adjudicated civil rights violator and the prosecutor Lavoie is a convict at all costs unethical disgrace.

    No. 12-036

    IN THE
    Supreme Court of Vermont

    ————

    State of Vermont,
    Appellee,
    v.

    Kyle Bolaski,
    Appellant.
    ————

    MOTION to INTERVENE

    ———

    Scott Huminski
    24544 Kingfish Street
    Bonita Springs, FL 34134
    (239) 300-6656
    s_huminski@live.com






    Scott Huminski (“Huminski”) moves to intervene, proffering that prosecutorial and judicial misconduct infected these proceedings, in the interests of justice and public policy as follows:
    Huminski moved in the District Court to intervene in this matter. Huminski sued Judge Zimmerman in Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2005) (Zimmerman participated in First Amendment violation banishing Huminski from a State Courthouse for life.)
    Regardless of a per se conflict of interest with Huminski, Judge Zimmerman failed to recuse and denied Huminski’s intervention in violation of judicial cannons. Justice Rieber participated as defense counsel for Judges Zimmerman and Corsones and sat in at depositions, etc. in the federal civil rights case.
    Prosecutor John Lavoie, Esq. dodged service (via returning mail) of Huminski’s several motions and affidavits filed in this matter in the Court Below. A bold violation of attorney ethics.

    THERE IS NO PLACE FOR JUDICIAL OR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN A MURDER TRIAL. THE TRIAL IS VOID FOR WANT OF DUE PROCESS.
    Served on all parties of record 6/3/2013
    Respectfully submitted,



    _________________________
    Scott Huminski
    24544 Kingfish Street
    Bonita Springs, FL 34134
    June 3, 2013

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory6/10/13, 4:50 PM

      Thank you, Mr. Huminski. Those are the allegations. What are the facts verifying those allegations? What was Huminski v. Corsones about? What was the reason for suing the judge?

      Delete
    2. Thanks Scott!
      I'm a big fan. Lavoie is a nut. Corsones violated your rights (don't take my word for it as the second circuit court of appeals) and many others too. Evidence should not have been excluded from trial. Everyone should be entitled to a defense. The court removed evidence that would have helped the defendant. It would be nice just to hear the truth for once.

      Delete
    3. Right on. By the way, the letters to lavoie containing the motions he evaded are filed in the district court with "refused" scribbled on them by Lavoie. That is a vast violation of attorney ethics. Evading service in a murder case. Not an allegation, fact.

      Delete
  9. I Am Sick About The Entire Situation. My Heart Breaks For The Tamburello Family. Kyle Should Stay In Prison. I Do Feel For His Parents, As Most Parents Do Love Their Children Uncondtionally. To Bad They Couldnt Let C.T. Have 5 Minutes Alone With Each Of Them. And Just One More Thing........ Robert Sands. YOU SUCK......... Oklahoma Mom Who At One Time Planned A Vermont Vacation.. And Now Wouldnt Step A Toe In That State. They Need To Clean House Starting With The AG Office.... R.I.P. Vinnie

    ReplyDelete
  10. Perhaps Bolaski will remain in prison, after he gets a fair trial. Prosecutor John T. Lavoie is as bad as prosecutors get.

    AG William Sorrell put lavoie on the case to get a conviction any way he could to silence vinny's family. Lavoie was perfect for the job and he did engage in prosecutorial misconduct, evidence that i forwarded to the Vermont Supreme Court and is now part of the sworn court record.

    I have no opinion on this case other than that any court proceeding involving Lavoie is tainted. Guilt or innocence will be determined at a fair trial - one without lavoie.

    ReplyDelete
  11. NOW TRUE JUSTICE CAN BE SOUGHT IN THIS CASE

    Lavoie, the crooked prosecutor in the case evaded service concerning my motion to intervene in the district court.

    Zimmerman who i successfully sued in federal court for civil rights charges ruled on my motion to intervene in the district court with a conflict of interest.

    Zimmerman is now retired --Justice has prevailed.

    I would be very surprised if Lavoie stays on, If he does I will file to intervene again based upon his wholesale violations of attorney ethical precepts. THis Lavoie character must be stopped.

    I have no opinion about guilt or innocence, I only can swear to the fact that Lavoie engages in prosecutorial misconduct and any case he is involved in violates Due Process.

    SCOTT HUMINSKI,

    ReplyDelete
  12. Here is a link to the full opinion

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/220609864/vermont-v-bolaski-Vermont-Supreme-Court-Opinion

    ReplyDelete
  13. Here is my filing in the case, Lavoie will be served this week and I will file with the court once vrap 40 expires

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/220763052/Vermont-v-Bolaski-Huminski-motion-to-intervene

    ReplyDelete
  14. From: s_huminski@live.com
    To: aginfo@atg.state.vt.us; mdonofrio@atg.state.vt.us; kylelm@atg.state.vt.us; wgriffin@atg.state.vt.us; skline@atg.state.vt.us; basay@atg.state.vt.us; jkolber@atg.state.vt.us; afitzgerald@atg.state.vt.us; secretary@sec.state.vt.us; wsorrell@atg.state.vt.us; cmaguire@atg.state.vt.us; john.lavoie@state.vt.us; wnelson05753@gmail.com; anna.saxman@state.vt.us; matthew.valerio@state.vt.us; ekruska@rivercitylawyers.com; brian@rivercitylawyers.com; lwilkes@rivercitylawyers.com; omartin@rivercitylawyers.com
    Subject: Lavoie evades service Web Link
    Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:58:39 -0400

    Here's the link on the web concerning Lavoie evading and dodging service in the case. Even in civil matters evasion of service is frowned upon, this is a murder case that Lavoie is toying with. This gamesmanship has no place in a murder case, it is patently unethical conduct of the government worthy of the sanction of dismissal of the charging instrument.

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/221608332/Lavoie-Evades-Service-in-Bolaski-Case-Vermont-v-Bolaski

    Lavoie has a per se conflict with me and so does Vermont, they should recuse. I am suing them for declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the threat issued by Lavoie on behalf of the State of Vermont.

    Huminski v. Vermont et al, USDC (M.D. FLorida) 2:13-cv-685-Ftm-29dnf,
    It was dismissed and then appealed to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. The appeals court found the dismissal premature as well as the appeal, thus, it is still pending in the USDC. 11th Circuit Docket, 13-14534, Huminski v. Vermont.

    As I am participating in Vt v. Bolaski, the state must appoint an independent non-biased prosecutor on the case. I will supply more details concerning lavoie's conflict of interest with me in a future email. The conflict is vast.
    -- scott huminski

    ReplyDelete
  15. Spoke to Lavoie's secretary yesterday, 5/2/2014, Lavoie ordered her to engage in evasion of service in the Vermont v. Bolaski case. She did not seem too happy to be Lavoie's pawn in this illegal conduct.

    ReplyDelete
  16. It is looking like Scott Huminski is obsessed with posting here about this case. Perhaps there is another side to this story from Lavoie?

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts