http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130426/NEWS02/704269878
Lawyers appeal Bolaski’s second degree murder conviction at Supreme Court
By Christian Avard
Staff Writer | April 26,2013
Rutland Herald
Kyle Bolaski
MONTPELIER — The Vermont Supreme Court will decide whether to throw out a second-degree murder conviction and allow a new trial in the shooting death of Vincent Tamburello of Springfield.
Lawyers for Kyle Bolaski of Chester argued to the court Thursday that the jury received erroneous instructions and Judge Patricia Zimmerman excluded Tamburello’s medical records from evidence to be presented to the jury. Bolaski’s lawyers said those were vital in showing Tamburello’s state of mind leading up to the killing and that he may have been suicidal.
Defense attorney William Nelson said if Tamburello was in control of himself, he would not have charged “suicidally” after a crowd of people and do damage to Bolaski’s truck. According to Nelson, Tamburello tried to commit suicide in the days leading up to the shooting on Aug. 17, 2008, and was a danger to himself and others.
“He made a suicide threat three days before (the shooting),” Nelson argued to the court. “The most recent suicide attempt, which the hospital took very seriously, was three weeks before. It would be suicidal to charge at a loaded gun.”
Associate Justice John Dooley noted that the state argued at the May 2011 trial that Bolaski’s lawyer Kevin Griffin did not say suicidal thoughts motivated Tamburello’s actions. Nelson disagreed.
“I think what we’re arguing here is perfectly implicit in (Griffin’s) argument to Judge Zimmerman and Judge Zimmerman understood it that way,” Nelson said.
“She said, in her opinion, from what I understand, is ‘At this point, Vinny didn’t care whether he lived or died,’” Nelson said. “It had been disclosed before the trial and (Zimmerman) acknowledged that maybe this was not a great thing to do, to rule out all this evidence.”
David Tartter of the Vermont attorney general’s office argued Thursday the defense cannot prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Tamburello was suicidal. They also maintained Bolaski shot Tamburello in the back.
“Trying to kill yourself is not a motive to kill yourself,” Tartter said.
“If someone I know kills himself and they ask why and I say ‘Because he was always trying to do that,’ that’s not a motive,” the prosecutor said. “(Tamburello) was moving backwards and the autopsy is consistent that he was.”
Tamburello and Bolaski’s parents were present at the hearing Thursday. Vincent Tamburello Sr. and his wife, Ronni, said their son was defending himself and his girlfriend at the time he was killed.
“That argument of ‘he wants to kill himself’ was absolutely ridiculous,” Tamburello said. “I didn’t hear anything relevant that would overturn (the decision). I hope they don’t.”
Trial testimony showed the incident leading to the second-degree murder conviction was the culmination of a dispute between two groups of friends over allegations of stolen marijuana. The parties met at MacKenzie Field in Chester.
Police said Bolaski, his brother, Corey and others friends approached Tamburello, who chased after the group with a splitting maul and damaged Bolaski’s truck.
Bolaski took out his hunting rifle, shot Tamburello twice and killed him, the jury found in May 2011.
Zimmerman denied a new trial and acquittal of the murder conviction in a September 2011 ruling. Bolaski is now serving 25 years to life at the Lee Adjustment Center in Beattyville, Ky.
“We stand by Kyle,” his father, David Bolaski, said after the hearing. “A good argument was made and we’re looking forward to the decision.”
He shot a man in the back!!!!!!!!
ReplyDeleteBad pennies keep turning up. This is why when you convict someone of cold-blooded murder that you should fry them instead of locking them up and letting their high paid lawyers clog the court system with nonsense for years.
ReplyDeleteActually, it costs a lot more to execute a person than to give them a life sentence. Well, that is, if you respect their Constitutional right to defend themselves.
DeleteAnd I think that any prisoner who appeals his sentence is proving that he is indeed getting punished-- he clearly dislikes incarceration so much that he's doing everything he can to get out. The ones who escape punishment are the ones like Timothy McVeigh (Oklahoma City bomber, for you youngsters), who refused to appeal his death sentence, and Gary Gilmore, the Utah convict who asked to be executed instead of given a life sentence.
To die is to escape punishment?
DeleteThats the ultimate punishment.
How can it cost more to execute someone with a bullet then feed them 3 meals a day?
DeletePersonally I think to stop people from committing acts of violence that lands them in jail for life they need to execute them. There would be less prison guards, less food, less electricity and less taxes spent. If someone is in jail for life with no chance of parole then it should be done.
It might make would be criminals think twice about committing crimes that land them in jail for life. Be more like Texas, if you kill someone in their state they will kill you back, quickly.
Under our legal system, prisoners are entitled to the fullest possible defense against capital punishment. It might take three years for just one appeal to be overruled in court, another two years for it to be overruled in appeals court, and five years to be heard at the Supreme Court level. Meanwhile, the charge meter is ticking at both the prosecutor's and defender's law offices. you could look it up.
DeleteThe punishments imposed by law are in part intended to deter future criminality and in part to ease the victims' needs for revenge and restitution. As 9:00 AM points out, sometimes the victims don't even get that with a death sentence. It would have been interesting to see how Cobb would have commented about his victim after being in the slammer for 60 more years.
Chuck , The father in the 9:00 sounded like he wanted the guy shot or to actually feel some pain. Instead he was just put down like a sick animal.
DeleteEither way he is dead and that should be a little message to those that want to commit crimes.
Thank you justice system for no rehab for this guy.
Actually it costs a lot less to execute a man than to give them a life sentence.
ReplyDeleteThe cost of the electrity (which could be solar derived making it a "green" execution) is very little.
The cost of the appeals(caused by bleeding heart libs)is the costly part.
Its much better to rehab a convicted killer than keep them in jail....tell that to the any victims family Chuck and see what happens.
This is a excerpt from The New York Daily News.
ReplyDeleteVery interesting comments and story.
The link to the full story is below.
............The father, stepmother and stepbrother of the man shot and killed by Cobb were among the witnesses. Also in the viewing area was one of the women who was shot and attacked but survived to testify against Cobb.
"I think justice was served but it doesn't change anything to speak of," the slain man's father, Don Vandever, said after watching Cobb die. "I do think the justice system needs to be more of a deterrent.
"All he did was go to sleep. That's it."
Nikki Daniels, 29, who was raped and shot during the 2002 attack but survived to testify against Cobb, said, "I thought he was going to be remorseful, I thought he was going to be apologetic, was hoping that he was going to address me.
"I saw the same evil person I saw 11 years ago. ... He definitely showed his true colors."
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/texas-murderer-cracks-sarcastic-jokes-execution-article-1.1328201#ixzz2RfT6fNVB
What a load of bull!! Kyle is getting what he deserved. Whether Vinnie though about suicide or not should not matter. That should not have been Kyle Bolaski's choice to make.
ReplyDeleteSorry Kyle ,you lost any credibility when you shot a man in the back,whether or not you felt threatened earlier he was obviously retreating and you shot him.
ReplyDeleteProsecutor John Lavoie engaged in misconduct, regardless of the facts, a new trial should be granted based upon prosecutorial misconduct alone.
ReplyDeleteAnd what are the facts to support your charge?
DeleteHere's the latest filing in the Vermont Supreme Court,
ReplyDeleteThe trial judge Zimmerman is an adjudicated civil rights violator and the prosecutor Lavoie is a convict at all costs unethical disgrace.
No. 12-036
IN THE
Supreme Court of Vermont
————
State of Vermont,
Appellee,
v.
Kyle Bolaski,
Appellant.
————
MOTION to INTERVENE
———
Scott Huminski
24544 Kingfish Street
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
(239) 300-6656
s_huminski@live.com
Scott Huminski (“Huminski”) moves to intervene, proffering that prosecutorial and judicial misconduct infected these proceedings, in the interests of justice and public policy as follows:
Huminski moved in the District Court to intervene in this matter. Huminski sued Judge Zimmerman in Huminski v. Corsones, 396 F.3d 53 (2nd Cir. 2005) (Zimmerman participated in First Amendment violation banishing Huminski from a State Courthouse for life.)
Regardless of a per se conflict of interest with Huminski, Judge Zimmerman failed to recuse and denied Huminski’s intervention in violation of judicial cannons. Justice Rieber participated as defense counsel for Judges Zimmerman and Corsones and sat in at depositions, etc. in the federal civil rights case.
Prosecutor John Lavoie, Esq. dodged service (via returning mail) of Huminski’s several motions and affidavits filed in this matter in the Court Below. A bold violation of attorney ethics.
THERE IS NO PLACE FOR JUDICIAL OR PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT IN A MURDER TRIAL. THE TRIAL IS VOID FOR WANT OF DUE PROCESS.
Served on all parties of record 6/3/2013
Respectfully submitted,
_________________________
Scott Huminski
24544 Kingfish Street
Bonita Springs, FL 34134
June 3, 2013
Thank you, Mr. Huminski. Those are the allegations. What are the facts verifying those allegations? What was Huminski v. Corsones about? What was the reason for suing the judge?
DeleteThanks Scott!
DeleteI'm a big fan. Lavoie is a nut. Corsones violated your rights (don't take my word for it as the second circuit court of appeals) and many others too. Evidence should not have been excluded from trial. Everyone should be entitled to a defense. The court removed evidence that would have helped the defendant. It would be nice just to hear the truth for once.
Right on. By the way, the letters to lavoie containing the motions he evaded are filed in the district court with "refused" scribbled on them by Lavoie. That is a vast violation of attorney ethics. Evading service in a murder case. Not an allegation, fact.
DeleteI Am Sick About The Entire Situation. My Heart Breaks For The Tamburello Family. Kyle Should Stay In Prison. I Do Feel For His Parents, As Most Parents Do Love Their Children Uncondtionally. To Bad They Couldnt Let C.T. Have 5 Minutes Alone With Each Of Them. And Just One More Thing........ Robert Sands. YOU SUCK......... Oklahoma Mom Who At One Time Planned A Vermont Vacation.. And Now Wouldnt Step A Toe In That State. They Need To Clean House Starting With The AG Office.... R.I.P. Vinnie
ReplyDeletePerhaps Bolaski will remain in prison, after he gets a fair trial. Prosecutor John T. Lavoie is as bad as prosecutors get.
ReplyDeleteAG William Sorrell put lavoie on the case to get a conviction any way he could to silence vinny's family. Lavoie was perfect for the job and he did engage in prosecutorial misconduct, evidence that i forwarded to the Vermont Supreme Court and is now part of the sworn court record.
I have no opinion on this case other than that any court proceeding involving Lavoie is tainted. Guilt or innocence will be determined at a fair trial - one without lavoie.
NOW TRUE JUSTICE CAN BE SOUGHT IN THIS CASE
ReplyDeleteLavoie, the crooked prosecutor in the case evaded service concerning my motion to intervene in the district court.
Zimmerman who i successfully sued in federal court for civil rights charges ruled on my motion to intervene in the district court with a conflict of interest.
Zimmerman is now retired --Justice has prevailed.
I would be very surprised if Lavoie stays on, If he does I will file to intervene again based upon his wholesale violations of attorney ethical precepts. THis Lavoie character must be stopped.
I have no opinion about guilt or innocence, I only can swear to the fact that Lavoie engages in prosecutorial misconduct and any case he is involved in violates Due Process.
SCOTT HUMINSKI,
Here is a link to the full opinion
ReplyDeletehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/220609864/vermont-v-bolaski-Vermont-Supreme-Court-Opinion
Here is my filing in the case, Lavoie will be served this week and I will file with the court once vrap 40 expires
ReplyDeletehttp://www.scribd.com/doc/220763052/Vermont-v-Bolaski-Huminski-motion-to-intervene
From: s_huminski@live.com
ReplyDeleteTo: aginfo@atg.state.vt.us; mdonofrio@atg.state.vt.us; kylelm@atg.state.vt.us; wgriffin@atg.state.vt.us; skline@atg.state.vt.us; basay@atg.state.vt.us; jkolber@atg.state.vt.us; afitzgerald@atg.state.vt.us; secretary@sec.state.vt.us; wsorrell@atg.state.vt.us; cmaguire@atg.state.vt.us; john.lavoie@state.vt.us; wnelson05753@gmail.com; anna.saxman@state.vt.us; matthew.valerio@state.vt.us; ekruska@rivercitylawyers.com; brian@rivercitylawyers.com; lwilkes@rivercitylawyers.com; omartin@rivercitylawyers.com
Subject: Lavoie evades service Web Link
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:58:39 -0400
Here's the link on the web concerning Lavoie evading and dodging service in the case. Even in civil matters evasion of service is frowned upon, this is a murder case that Lavoie is toying with. This gamesmanship has no place in a murder case, it is patently unethical conduct of the government worthy of the sanction of dismissal of the charging instrument.
http://www.scribd.com/doc/221608332/Lavoie-Evades-Service-in-Bolaski-Case-Vermont-v-Bolaski
Lavoie has a per se conflict with me and so does Vermont, they should recuse. I am suing them for declaratory and injunctive relief concerning the threat issued by Lavoie on behalf of the State of Vermont.
Huminski v. Vermont et al, USDC (M.D. FLorida) 2:13-cv-685-Ftm-29dnf,
It was dismissed and then appealed to the 11th Circuit in Atlanta. The appeals court found the dismissal premature as well as the appeal, thus, it is still pending in the USDC. 11th Circuit Docket, 13-14534, Huminski v. Vermont.
As I am participating in Vt v. Bolaski, the state must appoint an independent non-biased prosecutor on the case. I will supply more details concerning lavoie's conflict of interest with me in a future email. The conflict is vast.
-- scott huminski
Spoke to Lavoie's secretary yesterday, 5/2/2014, Lavoie ordered her to engage in evasion of service in the Vermont v. Bolaski case. She did not seem too happy to be Lavoie's pawn in this illegal conduct.
ReplyDeleteIt is looking like Scott Huminski is obsessed with posting here about this case. Perhaps there is another side to this story from Lavoie?
ReplyDelete