Thursday, April 25, 2013

Rental ordinance approval process to begin again

A new ordinance that would require all Springfield landlords to register their apartments and subject them to state and local inspections went through so many revisions this week that the Springfield Select Board has to restart the formal approval process.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130425/NEWS02/704259915

15 comments :

  1. kudos to the select board and town government for moving forward.

    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just another way to get your money. Just wait, the town will pass an ordinance that will require ALL homeowners to have their houses inspected "for safety sake" all to get a few more bucks out of your pockets.

    ReplyDelete
  3. They want to put pressure on out-of-town landlords? Really? What about all the local real estate agents who buy up distressed houses and then break them up into several dwellings? As if out-of-town landlords are the main problem here!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this pertains to them as well.

      I dont think they are saying if you are a local landlord you are exempt from these regulations.

      Delete
  4. re: "The rental registry ordinance is viewed as one tool of getting a better idea of the number of apartments in Springfield"

    Let me get this straight, even after a government census and town wide property appraisals, the town office/Bill Kerns has no friggn' idea on the number of apartments in this fetid rathole? That after all the screwing around the Select Board still isn't prepared enact zoning to curtail expansion? What are these jerk-offs thinking, that doing a fire inspection every five years will Turn Spfld into Palm Springs overnight?

    Here's a thought, enact zoning to put the lid on any further rental property expansion, NOW. Also curtail mobile home and cheap-ass modular home expansion. Reevaluate rental property as income producing business and tax it at rate proportional to the demands its tenants place on town services. I'd say that would be about 10:1 over the typical home owner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 3:11 is right on target!

      The FEW inspections done by the Health Officer (aka Fire Chief) are directed towards legitimate businesses in town where the Chief can feel like a big shot.

      How about protecting our little kids who sleep EVERY NIGHT in these tinder boxes called 'apartments'.

      Let's get something DONE!...before we're all shaking our heads on the way to a funeral.

      Delete
    2. Did you miss something? This is exactly what they are trying to do...

      Delete
    3. re: 8:14 PM
      They're trying to gather as much intelligence at your private expense.

      Delete
    4. I need to see your papers......sound familiar?

      Delete
  5. About 95% of the problems I have with my 16 units is based on tenants inability to clean up after themselves and lack of any responsibility. Unbelievable what I've seen tenants do. One couple destroyed a place in one week to the tune of $5500. I've been selling out to get out of being the landlord to those without a lick of sense. The sad thing is, it will always be the landlords problem, as they have the pockets. Yeah, I'm one of those slum landlords. But I've never rented out a place I wouldn't live in myself. But very few of the units I own would pass any inspection, when they're vacated. The laws in force facilitate this bad behavior of tenants.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with you.
      You rent a decent place to people you think are decent, then the renters trash it.

      Delete
    2. One year was so bad, that I would have made more money if I had been paid just $1 per bag of trash I had to haul out of my vacated units.

      Delete
  6. Anon 11:13 one would think that you would not be burdened by such problems if you rented to respectable working persons who have a history of responsible behavior if your apartments are as nice as you say. But then people like us don't want to live in apartments where we are subjected to screaming kids, screaming parents, drug dealers, drunken brawls, police screaming up to the door every weekend to referee the latest domestic and neighbors that have no respect for one another. Where I live is no place fancy but I don't need fancy when I have the luxury of peace of mind and working neighbors that respect each other. My rent is less than $700/month which includes everything but then my landlord's primary goal is to have responsible, respectable tenants, not make tons of money. And yes I pay for my rent....not the state and NO I don't live in Springfield...I would but sadly there are few places I would consider living and the rent is so exorbitant there is no way most people who don't receive state assistance can afford it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ahhh, the good ol' days, when a Section 8 was a type of discharge from military service! Little did we know the label would come to sybolize the fate of a failing town in southeast Vermont.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. re: Anon 4:18 PM
      "failing" or "failed"?

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts