http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130425/NEWS02/704259915
News | Southern Vermont
Rental ordinance approval process to begin again
By Susan Smallheer
Staff Writer | April 25,2013
Rutland Herald
SPRINGFIELD — A new ordinance that would require all Springfield landlords to register their apartments and subject them to state and local inspections went through so many revisions this week that the Springfield Select Board has to restart the formal approval process.
The board will re-warn the second formal hearing or review of the ordinance, which has been months in the making.
Kristi Morris, chairman of the Select Board, said he was concerned with some of the language in the ordinance, and he said the ordinance had inaccurate legal citations. He also said he was concerned with the number of inspections to which the apartments would be subjected.
Town Attorney Stephen Ankuda and Town Zoning Administrator Bill Kearns went through the ordinance, debating the meaning of language.
At one point, the discussion had bogged down so badly that Town Manager Robert Forguites suggested that the ordinance be sent back to the town’s Ordinance Committee for another review.
But Ankuda, who had been working on the draft for months, pushed ahead, outlining the changes the board wanted for clarification, thus avoiding sending the ordinance back to the drawing board.
Under the plan, landlords must register their properties with the town, and the state Division of Fire Safety would inspect each apartment within five years. The apartment would also be inspected by the town’s health officer, a post which is currently held by Fire Chief Russell Thompson. Finally, landlords would have to get a certificate of occupancy from Kearns’ office.
“It’s meant to be mechanical from Bill’s end,” said Ankuda.
The rental registry ordinance is viewed as one tool of getting a better idea of the number of apartments in Springfield, and putting pressure on out-of-town landlords to keep their apartments in better condition and with more responsible tenants.
Town officials have said the town has a greater proportion of low-income housing compared to any other town in Windsor County, which in their minds leads to increased crime and other extra costs.
Selectman David Yesman, who is a landlord, voiced concern about the ordinance, saying that having multiple inspections would inevitably and unfairly lead to multiple and expensive lists of needed improvements.
Kearns said he is interested in making sure people are building what they say they are building on their permits, and that there is an accurate list of apartments for health and safety reasons.
The town is not adopting a building code, Kearns said, but only inspecting for health and safety concerns.
The proposed ordinance will undergo another review May 13, with Fire Chief Thompson in attendance.
kudos to the select board and town government for moving forward.
ReplyDeleteKeep up the good work.
Just another way to get your money. Just wait, the town will pass an ordinance that will require ALL homeowners to have their houses inspected "for safety sake" all to get a few more bucks out of your pockets.
ReplyDeleteThey want to put pressure on out-of-town landlords? Really? What about all the local real estate agents who buy up distressed houses and then break them up into several dwellings? As if out-of-town landlords are the main problem here!
ReplyDeleteI think this pertains to them as well.
DeleteI dont think they are saying if you are a local landlord you are exempt from these regulations.
re: "The rental registry ordinance is viewed as one tool of getting a better idea of the number of apartments in Springfield"
ReplyDeleteLet me get this straight, even after a government census and town wide property appraisals, the town office/Bill Kerns has no friggn' idea on the number of apartments in this fetid rathole? That after all the screwing around the Select Board still isn't prepared enact zoning to curtail expansion? What are these jerk-offs thinking, that doing a fire inspection every five years will Turn Spfld into Palm Springs overnight?
Here's a thought, enact zoning to put the lid on any further rental property expansion, NOW. Also curtail mobile home and cheap-ass modular home expansion. Reevaluate rental property as income producing business and tax it at rate proportional to the demands its tenants place on town services. I'd say that would be about 10:1 over the typical home owner.
3:11 is right on target!
DeleteThe FEW inspections done by the Health Officer (aka Fire Chief) are directed towards legitimate businesses in town where the Chief can feel like a big shot.
How about protecting our little kids who sleep EVERY NIGHT in these tinder boxes called 'apartments'.
Let's get something DONE!...before we're all shaking our heads on the way to a funeral.
Did you miss something? This is exactly what they are trying to do...
Deletere: 8:14 PM
DeleteThey're trying to gather as much intelligence at your private expense.
I need to see your papers......sound familiar?
DeleteAbout 95% of the problems I have with my 16 units is based on tenants inability to clean up after themselves and lack of any responsibility. Unbelievable what I've seen tenants do. One couple destroyed a place in one week to the tune of $5500. I've been selling out to get out of being the landlord to those without a lick of sense. The sad thing is, it will always be the landlords problem, as they have the pockets. Yeah, I'm one of those slum landlords. But I've never rented out a place I wouldn't live in myself. But very few of the units I own would pass any inspection, when they're vacated. The laws in force facilitate this bad behavior of tenants.
ReplyDeleteI agree with you.
DeleteYou rent a decent place to people you think are decent, then the renters trash it.
One year was so bad, that I would have made more money if I had been paid just $1 per bag of trash I had to haul out of my vacated units.
DeleteAnon 11:13 one would think that you would not be burdened by such problems if you rented to respectable working persons who have a history of responsible behavior if your apartments are as nice as you say. But then people like us don't want to live in apartments where we are subjected to screaming kids, screaming parents, drug dealers, drunken brawls, police screaming up to the door every weekend to referee the latest domestic and neighbors that have no respect for one another. Where I live is no place fancy but I don't need fancy when I have the luxury of peace of mind and working neighbors that respect each other. My rent is less than $700/month which includes everything but then my landlord's primary goal is to have responsible, respectable tenants, not make tons of money. And yes I pay for my rent....not the state and NO I don't live in Springfield...I would but sadly there are few places I would consider living and the rent is so exorbitant there is no way most people who don't receive state assistance can afford it.
ReplyDeleteAhhh, the good ol' days, when a Section 8 was a type of discharge from military service! Little did we know the label would come to sybolize the fate of a failing town in southeast Vermont.
ReplyDeletere: Anon 4:18 PM
Delete"failing" or "failed"?