Thursday, January 2, 2014

2013 Arrest Offenses

A list of arrests made during the past year, from the Springfield Police Department.

Springfield Police Department
2013 Arrest Offenses


Statute Description  & Total


ASSAULT SIMPLE             7

AGG ASSAULT W/ DEADLY         1
WEAPON

AGG ASSAULT W/DEADLY            1
WEAPON LE OFFICER

RECKLESS              4
ENDANGERMENT

DISORDERLY CONDUCT      8
FIGHT ETC

DISORDERLY CONDUCT          2
NOISE

DISORDERLY CONDUCT       2
LANGUAGE

DISORDERLY CONDUCT     1
OBSTRUCT

DISTURBING THE PEACE     2
BY PHONE

DISTURBING PEACE 1
PHONE THREATEN HARM

ASSAULT ON LAW ENF.   4
OFFICER

ASSAULT-FLUIDS-LE OR   2
EMG PERSO

VIOLATION OF ABUSE    3
PREV ORDER

VIOLATION ABUSE PREV    2
ORDER 2ND

INTERFERE W/ACCESS    1
EMERG SERVI

DOMESTIC ASSAULT   8

ASSAULT AGG DOMESTIC    4
1 ST DEG

STALKING    1

BURGLARY    3

BURGLARY OCCUPIED 3DWELLING

BURGLARY - DWELLING    1

CRUELTY TO PERSON IN    1
CUSTODY/CARE OF ANOTHER

CONSPIRACY    2

ESCAPE CUSTODY- SERVICE    1
WORK

FALSE ALARM BOMB    1
THREAT

FALSE INFO LE IMPLICATE          12
ANTHER

FORGERY/COUNTERFEITING         2

COUNTERFEITING            1

FALSE PRETENSES TKNS         1

FELONY FALSE PRETENSES            1
TOKENS >$900

MISDEAMEANOR FALSE PRETENSES    2
TOKENS

GRAND LARCENY > $500     1

PETIT LARCENCY

RECEIVE STOLEN PROPTY    1
>100/DEA

RECEIVE STOLEN            3
PROPERTY >100

RECVE STOLEN       1
PROPERTY

RETAIL THEFT

THEFT OF SERVICE > $500    1

LEWD & LASCIVIOUS    1
COND W/CHILD

ACCESSORY - COMM OF    2
FELONY

IMPEDING PUBLIC    1
OFFICERS

RESISTING ARREST    4

UNL MISCHIEF >250

UNL MISCHIEF

UNLAWFUL TRESPAS -   4
MISD

UNLAWFUL TRESPASS     4
DWELLING

VAGRANTS ENTERING    1
BUILDINGS

ACCESSORY BEFORE THE    1
FACT

CARRYING FIREARM    1
DURING FELONY

ARREST ACTIVE    10
WARRANT

ACCESSORY AFTER THE    1
FACT

ASSAULT & ROBBERY    1
(LARCENY)

ASSAULT & ROBBERY      3
(WITH INJRY)

VIOLATION CONDITION    2
OF RELEASE

CONTEMPT COURT-VIOL    30
COND RELEA

POSSESSION OF     5
MARIJUANA

POSSESSION OF      1
MARIJUANA >1 LB

SALE OF MARIJUANA > 1LB       1

POSSESSI OF COCAINE     3
(REG DRUG)

POSSESSION OF COCAINE     2
>1 OZ

SALE OF COCAINE
GMS

POSSESS HEROIN < 200     3
MGRAMS

POSSESS HEROIN > 200     1
MGRAMS

POSS     2
DEP/STIM/NARC-NOTCOC/HER

MARIJUANA INTO     1
DETENTION CTR

C&N RECKLESS DRIVING    8

OOC-AGGRAVATED     1

EXCESSIVE SPEED     1
(>30MPH, ETC)

ATTPT TO ELUDE POLICE     5
OFFICER

DUI    6

DUI #1 > LEGAL LIMIT   3

DUI #3 > LEGAL LIMIT   2

DUI #4                1
SUBSEQUENT/LEGAL
LIMIT

DUI #4                1
SUBSEQUENT/INFLUENCE

DUI #1 > DRUG OR BOTH      4

CARELESS & NEGLIGENT        1

DRIVING - LICENSE     11
SUSPENDED

DRIVING LICENSE        9
SUSPENDED/OSC

VEHICLE OP LICENSE 4
SUSP DUI #1

VEHICLE OP LICENSE 2
SUSP DUI #2

VEHICLE OP LICENSE 1
SUSP DUI #4

Alcohol Open   1
Container/Consume

MINOR POSSESSING  2
ALCOHOL /1ST

MINOR >=16 CONSUME   1
ALCOHOL/1ST

MINOR >=16 ALCOHOL   1
CONSUME/2ND

FURN ALC TO MINOR     2

ALCOHOL ENABLING BY    1
MINOR

Total : 266


13 comments :

  1. I do not understand these numbers.
    Are they times 10 ?
    Only 4 heroin arrests ? Thought there were more than that.
    Total of 266 ? Less than 1 per day .
    These numbers make no sense.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This looks more like the totals for the start of the 2014 year! not all of 2013..there is no way this is all there is. I read in the police log more than this..someone trying to make our town look better? lol

    ReplyDelete
  3. We all know that our community is not this soft. Re-count SPD......re-count.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think what you will find is that those arrests are ONLY what SPD did. NOT included are the arrests that other agencies made such as State Police, Drug Task force etc etc.

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's it? Ridiculous. The only ones in double digits are ones that offend the official establishment: lying to implicate another, violating conditions of release and DLS. It boggles my mind that with all the drugs and crime this is it. I'm sure the police will say it's because they need more cops.

    ReplyDelete
  6. chuck gregory1/2/14, 5:23 PM

    Only 266 arrests in a town of 4,000-plus? Pretty peaceful place, I'd say. And look at the categories where the most arrests were made-- gives quite a different picture from what Alan Smithee always claims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. After seeing the news of a father shooting his son and then hanging himself in Essex, VT, and the homicides in other "affluent" towns/cities in VT, I started thinking about how Springfield is relatively safe and low in crime in that respect. That's a good thing.

      Delete
    2. How many of these arrests were prison inmates?

      Delete
  7. Actually the state has made changes to the database information is stored in thus causing a significant impact on the ability to run statistical information. Still trying to find where the discrepancy is. Another report shows a total of 374 arrests but none of the report functions are pulling the missing information. Still working on it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. chuck gregory1/2/14, 8:37 PM

    thanks, Wendy! 374 arrests-- any duplicates?-- would indicate an arrest rate of 9% or thereabouts. How might that compare with other towns of the same socioeconomic profile?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Look how many people violated the conditions of their release... Scary... Love being a prison town. :(

    ReplyDelete
  10. Being a prison town has nothing to do at all with conditions of release violations...conditions of release are set by a court to keep people out of jail.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I love the officers at the police dept ...I have problems with dispatchers not all of them just wendy taft. most of the officers are very courteous but then u got officers who just like to threatned people that didnt do anything wrong. main st in springfield is full of dealers and the town needs more money so they let the dealers deal make it out to be a problem when they could solve the problem by walking around the town bring bike cops in and undercover everyone watches dealers deal but somehow the police don't. seems weird and the amount of welfare in springfield is ridiculous most welfare money goes on drugs not all but most and I dont wanna hear anyone defend it cause they r on welfare its a true statement not made up

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts