Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Budget group wants action on Park Street School

Town budget committee wants town to get going on what to do about Park Street School.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20140121/NEWS02/701219953

16 comments :

  1. The town and school district would save a lot of money if they could play well together.

    Why don't the two share office space, why does the district have to pay a private company to plow, and can't equivalent departments share resources?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Why would the town want to play nice with the school district? That would put their budget at risk, it is better that they play the good guy to the big bad school district that always raises our taxes.

      Delete
    2. Nobody usually pays much attention to the town budget. Passes every time without a fuss.

      Delete
    3. I guess it's about time we started paying attention to it..... Yes?

      Delete
  2. "Forguites said the suggestion of moving parks and recreation into the building, including the Springfield Senior Center, has been discussed before and faces strong opposition from the Springfield seniors. They like their current home in the Springfield Community Center, Forguites said."

    I am sure they do, but if it is getting funded by the town, too bad. There is a van that can pick up the seniors and take them to the new facility.

    I agree with the above comment. Why can't the town RENT space from the school district for the Parks and Rec program. The traffic and parking at the Parks and Rec building is awful. It is a miracle someone hasn't been hit by a car crossing the street there.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Every year Park Street is discussed and each time someone is astute enough to remind us that we voted to sell or give the building away. Despite this, Central Offices are still housed there and other programs.
    Why are we discussing something that should have been gone years ago? Why won't the school board and select board honor the peoples choice?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. << Anon 2:28 - It is a matter of cost at this point. There is not enough room to house everything in the district's existing buildings, and rental space costs more.

      Park Street School still houses the before and after school program spaces (multiple rooms of dedicated space needed), central offices, business offices, district buildings and grounds, special ed offices, and assorted community programs that use the gym, auditorium, and conference room (old library).

      Gateway has already been consolidated into Riverside, and EEE to Elm Hill. East School was under sale contract to the hospital, but they backed out.

      Consolidating other town resources at Park Street may seem like the least bad option, but I have not heard any better, and would love to.

      It is what it is, we as a town need to decide what is best -> moving <- forward, instead of being paralyzed by the past. At least Park Street it is a beautiful and historic building that the town can be proud of.

      Delete
  4. You mean to tell me that Springfield can't find the space for 20 cubicles in all its other facilities??? If would be more affordable to close and scrap out the Park Street facility and roll the savings toward the purchase of a Butler Building large enough to contain 20 work stations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You base this on absolutely no research and facts... please do you homework before saying such things..

      Delete
  5. heres a thought. the fire dept and police dept both were housed in town hall. how about we use all the empty space there and move the central office staff there. it makes sense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Why doesn't anyone think of the kids? These idiots are fighting over pffice space when our kids are graduating more unprepared and uneducated. Maybe if there was the proper balance between town and school our children would have a better chance and this town wouldn't be filled with dried up high school football stars, old headis cheerleaders,and teenaged parents who never got a chance to do more.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Once the building has been razed, I see a nice cul de sac or circle with several patio homes - all paying property taxes to the town instead of draining its coffers dry!

    ReplyDelete
  8. "I purchased a 40x60x14 metal building for $9,483. All construction will be done by myself and 2 friends, which saves about 8-10 thousand dollars, as well as the foundation construction which cost $3.85 per sq. foot. By doing it myself I was able to save $6,300. All plumbing and electrical will be done by myself and friends as well as the h/ac for under $2,400. Entire cost of building and finished inside with all amenities come to $19,771.

    Even at twice that cost it would be a bargain for Springfield.

    ReplyDelete
  9. 3 years ago this was brought to a vote, and it was voted to either sell or give away this building away. Why hasn't this been done. Why are there offices still being used in this building that was said to too expensive to keep. The property owners in this town paid big bucks for expansions to move these kids out of Park Street. This is ridiculous. Do what the voters asked and get this building off the books.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Park St school would be a great town hall, police station and elderly program spot. Combining these at that location saves money spent on the present police station which should be closer to town central and prevent longer distance response to need. I space provided the community center could also be there getting the program off of Main Street on a bad curve for crossing.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts