http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20140121/NEWS02/701219953
ublished January 21, 2014 in the Rutland Herald Budget group wants action on Park Street School By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD — Selectman David Yesman in the past offered to buy the old Park Street School for $1. Yesman, a local real estate agent, was only half kidding. But Yesman would like to see some action on what he views as a directive from Springfield voters in 2010 to either sell the former elementary school, or give it away. The Springfield town budget committee recently weighed in on the fate of the 1895 school and said last week the town ought to study moving the town offices and the parks and recreation department into the school, which at one point was the town’s high school. The building has a gymnasium and auditorium, and is the current home to the Springfield School District’s administrative offices. The school, with its ornate marble halls, is a throwback to more prosperous times in Springfield. Town Manager Robert Forguites said Monday the school would be too big for the town office and the parks and recreation department. Plus, he said, the school would have to be renovated to accommodate the two town departments. Forguites said the suggestion of moving parks and recreation into the building, including the Springfield Senior Center, has been discussed before and faces strong opposition from the Springfield seniors. They like their current home in the Springfield Community Center, Forguites said. The Community Center, which is located at the foot of Main Street, is within walking distance of the Whitcomb Building, one of the large senior housing apartment buildings in town. The other one, the Huber Building, is a longer walk up Main Street. While the parking at the Community Center is limited, Forguites said, the seniors and others have an agreement with the Calvary Baptist Church to use their parking lot and cross the street, he said. Getting to Park Street School from Main Street is an uphill walk, he added. Yesman has had other real estate dealings with the Springfield School District in the past. Last year, he was the exclusive agent to sell the former East School, a large brick structure on Summer Street. The sale to the Springfield Medical Care Systems fell through. Yesman said Monday he had been contacted by someone — he wouldn’t say who — who was interested in renting part of the Park Street School. He said the proposal would have to go before the Park Street School Committee, as well as the town and the School Board. Yesman serves on the committee, along with Springfield Select Board Chairman Kristi Morris, and Springfield School Board members Steve Karaffa and Kenneth Vandenburgh. Those committee members in turn appointed local Springfield businessman Stephen Greene. Yesman said the group hadn’t had a meeting since December, and the members were trying to schedule a meeting by the end of the week. Yesman said the parks and recreation department already used the gymnasium at Park Street School. But he said if the town vacated both the Community Center and the Town Hall, the question would be what to do with those buildings. “You might be swapping a $5 cat for a $5 dog,” he said. But he said having 20 school administration employees in a 90,000-square-foot building wasn’t economical for the town. He said Superintendent Zach McLaughlin had told the group he would do whatever the group wanted, but that office space would have to be rented if the school was sold.
The town and school district would save a lot of money if they could play well together.
ReplyDeleteWhy don't the two share office space, why does the district have to pay a private company to plow, and can't equivalent departments share resources?
Why would the town want to play nice with the school district? That would put their budget at risk, it is better that they play the good guy to the big bad school district that always raises our taxes.
DeleteNobody usually pays much attention to the town budget. Passes every time without a fuss.
DeleteI guess it's about time we started paying attention to it..... Yes?
Delete"Forguites said the suggestion of moving parks and recreation into the building, including the Springfield Senior Center, has been discussed before and faces strong opposition from the Springfield seniors. They like their current home in the Springfield Community Center, Forguites said."
ReplyDeleteI am sure they do, but if it is getting funded by the town, too bad. There is a van that can pick up the seniors and take them to the new facility.
I agree with the above comment. Why can't the town RENT space from the school district for the Parks and Rec program. The traffic and parking at the Parks and Rec building is awful. It is a miracle someone hasn't been hit by a car crossing the street there.
Every year Park Street is discussed and each time someone is astute enough to remind us that we voted to sell or give the building away. Despite this, Central Offices are still housed there and other programs.
ReplyDeleteWhy are we discussing something that should have been gone years ago? Why won't the school board and select board honor the peoples choice?
<< Anon 2:28 - It is a matter of cost at this point. There is not enough room to house everything in the district's existing buildings, and rental space costs more.
DeletePark Street School still houses the before and after school program spaces (multiple rooms of dedicated space needed), central offices, business offices, district buildings and grounds, special ed offices, and assorted community programs that use the gym, auditorium, and conference room (old library).
Gateway has already been consolidated into Riverside, and EEE to Elm Hill. East School was under sale contract to the hospital, but they backed out.
Consolidating other town resources at Park Street may seem like the least bad option, but I have not heard any better, and would love to.
It is what it is, we as a town need to decide what is best -> moving <- forward, instead of being paralyzed by the past. At least Park Street it is a beautiful and historic building that the town can be proud of.
You mean to tell me that Springfield can't find the space for 20 cubicles in all its other facilities??? If would be more affordable to close and scrap out the Park Street facility and roll the savings toward the purchase of a Butler Building large enough to contain 20 work stations.
ReplyDeleteYou base this on absolutely no research and facts... please do you homework before saying such things..
Deleteheres a thought. the fire dept and police dept both were housed in town hall. how about we use all the empty space there and move the central office staff there. it makes sense.
ReplyDeleteThe first floor of the Springfield Town Hall has been leased out for $700 a month since December 2011.
Deletespringfieldvt.blogspot.com/2011/12/vermont-superior-court-coming-to.html
springfieldvt.blogspot.com/2011/12/photos-opening-of-new-court-office.html
Why doesn't anyone think of the kids? These idiots are fighting over pffice space when our kids are graduating more unprepared and uneducated. Maybe if there was the proper balance between town and school our children would have a better chance and this town wouldn't be filled with dried up high school football stars, old headis cheerleaders,and teenaged parents who never got a chance to do more.
ReplyDeleteOnce the building has been razed, I see a nice cul de sac or circle with several patio homes - all paying property taxes to the town instead of draining its coffers dry!
ReplyDelete"I purchased a 40x60x14 metal building for $9,483. All construction will be done by myself and 2 friends, which saves about 8-10 thousand dollars, as well as the foundation construction which cost $3.85 per sq. foot. By doing it myself I was able to save $6,300. All plumbing and electrical will be done by myself and friends as well as the h/ac for under $2,400. Entire cost of building and finished inside with all amenities come to $19,771.
ReplyDeleteEven at twice that cost it would be a bargain for Springfield.
3 years ago this was brought to a vote, and it was voted to either sell or give away this building away. Why hasn't this been done. Why are there offices still being used in this building that was said to too expensive to keep. The property owners in this town paid big bucks for expansions to move these kids out of Park Street. This is ridiculous. Do what the voters asked and get this building off the books.
ReplyDeletePark St school would be a great town hall, police station and elderly program spot. Combining these at that location saves money spent on the present police station which should be closer to town central and prevent longer distance response to need. I space provided the community center could also be there getting the program off of Main Street on a bad curve for crossing.
ReplyDelete