Wednesday, June 22, 2016

Springfield organization looks into creating ‘co-working space’

Springfield On the Move (SOM), a nonprofit downtown organization, is looking into potential sites and seeking feedback from independent workers such as artists, freelancers, telecommuters, designers, and professional service providers who may be interested in a co-working space in Springfield.

www.eagletimes.com    

17 comments :

  1. How much are tax payers bankrolling consultant Lars Torres for this nonsense?

    ReplyDelete
  2. How about the Woolson Block? Great location, and a much better use for it than a home for transient juvenile delinquents!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That is a great idea on many levels. Something I could support rather than the usual stuff jammed down our throats by the "we know better than you" powers that be in town.

      Delete
  3. SOM will come up with many idea's to suck money out of the town,as long as they can keep getting enough to draw a paychecks they will keep thinking

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hum, lets see,
    Maybe these professionals can move in and co-exist:
    SOM (Springfield On the Move)
    DOH (Dealers of Heroin)
    NOW (Guy on the corner holding the sign for Need Of Work)
    FBR (Fix Bryants Roof)
    HCRS (Satellite Office)
    GOOJF (Get Out OF Jail Free Attorneys of Lawlessness)
    SPFD (Smart Phone For Dummies) ie How to text and walk and not hit a tree
    DSC (Drivers Safety Course) ie how to drive the speed limit

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You forgot IDIOT. The Interim Depository for Insane Obnoxious Transients.

      Delete
  5. :) Nice collection. DOH is passably well organized already, ain't it? And it seems to co-exist with GOOJF pretty well too. Should be held up as an example? All over the country, LEOs are doing their job - over and over.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes, and I forgot CRAP (Citizens Rebel Against Progress)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This may come as a shock, but I have always supported publicly funded social programs. Well, the ones that work anyway. The problem I have is the creation of the Welfare Industrial Complex here in town. The modern left has abandoned the idea of improving wages and working conditions and instead has focused on warehousing the poor, and coddling our nation's youth well into adulthood. These public-private partnerships are nothing more than goldmines for their owners; neither staff nor clients benefit very much. I know because I've worked for a few. I say these things as a social scientist. As a resident and taxpayer, my attitude changes. When I moved here two years ago and drove downtown, I saw "youth in transition" hanging around, glaring at people, and selling drugs. When the Woolson Block closed, they were gone, and downtown became a much more pleasant place to be. Downtown should be a showplace, where the town puts it's best foot forward, not a place that makes decent citizens nervous. The only way to attract businesses and yes, people with money, into this town is to dress it up. You can't do this by turning downtown into one big social experiment. There are plenty of empty buildings in town that could be renovated for that purpose.

      Delete
    2. George T McNaughton6/26/16, 9:45 PM

      I share your concern, and would not support the proposal for the Woolson Block except for the ownership and control to be exercised by the local Housing Authority. If you look at the Downtown in recent years, however, the one major redevelopment that is a major bright spot has been the theater renovation which was spearheaded by the Housing Authority. I feel that our best hope for the Woolson Block is the notion that it will do as good of a job with that building as it did with the theater. We have already witnessed what happens with a private owner. I would oppose the project but for the commitments made by the local Housing Authority.

      Delete
    3. Are you in fact proceeding with plan for the "youth in transition" program, and what are these commitments? I read something about supervision, which doesn't exactly fill me with confidence. Being somewhat new around here my access to information is rather limited, so I do appreciate anything you can give me.

      Delete
    4. George T McNaughton6/29/16, 9:56 AM

      It is my understanding that an environmental assessment is taking place now, and the Housing Authority is expected to close the purchase this fall. The transition program which will occupy a portion of the upstairs is part of the package. Part of the planning, as I understand it, involves a roof top porch on the river side of the building so the occupants will not use the sidewalk as their front porch or as a place to loiter. Not all supervision is created equal, but I have some higher confidence in the Housing Authority because it has a local board. What I don't have confidence in is private landlords receiving guarantees from Section 8 and subsidies from social service agencies. I have met with the Housing Authority Director several times regarding the supervision issue. He is very aware of community concerns.

      Delete
    5. Thanks for the reply. I agree 100% that privately rented Section 8 residences are problematic, for many reasons. Even when the owners are decent people, bad tenants are nearly impossible to get rid of. I still think that the Woolson Block would be better utilized as office space, or housing for seniors, etc. I hope that if the experiment fails that you, or whomever is on the Board, will be willing to seek alternatives. Thanks again.

      Delete
    6. chuck gregory6/29/16, 6:13 PM

      We should be looking at the participants in the Youth In Transition program as potential assets to the community rather than stereotyping them as just another class of losers.

      Who among us would not be pleased to arrive in a strange city and be approached by residents who ask us to contribute our energy, time and information for a good civic cause?

      We can always say no, but the implicit acknowledgment that we as strangers have strengths they could put to use is just about the warmest welcome a newly-arrived person could hope for.

      If we're smart, we'll put this notion into action.

      Delete
    7. George T. McNaughton6/30/16, 12:22 PM

      I will not be on the Selectboard when Woolson Block is resurrected, however, if a problem develops -- public pressure can be applied to both the Selectboard and the Housing Authority which are more likely to respond than a private landlord.

      Delete
  7. It's sad because many people think "non profits" are just volunteers. They usually are paid very well and take money from the causes they claim to help.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. George T McNaughton6/29/16, 4:21 PM

      This has become a serious issue in Springfield. There are many non profits that are volunteer based, but many are not. It would not be as big of an issue, if the elected government leaders were not prone to abdicating or delegating functions to the not for profits and the townspeople were not prone to passing special appropriations without investigating what exactly the social service agency was in fact doing. Until we get both under control, it will be an ongoing issue. There is still a place for non profits funded by private donations and run by volunteers.

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts