www.eagletimes.com
The Citizen Argus Champion Message for the Week 2016-10-29 / Front Page New executive director has big ideas for Springfield nonprofit By TORY JONES BONENFANT toryb@eagletimes.com New Springfield on the Move Executive Director Stephen Plunkard takes a brief break from working on downtown development on Friday morning, Oct. 28 in downtown Springfield. — TORY JONES BONENFANT New Springfield on the Move Executive Director Stephen Plunkard takes a brief break from working on downtown development on Friday morning, Oct. 28 in downtown Springfield. — TORY JONES BONENFANT SPRINGFIELD — Stephen Plunkard recalled the day he first drove into Springfield in 1978 with his wife and young son. “I saw the church steeple and I thought, this is Mayberry R.F.D.!” he said. He had been working in Philadelphia, he said in an interview on Friday, Oct. 28 at his office at Springfield on the Move’s downtown headquarters. He began serving as the new executive director for SOM two weeks ago, replacing Carol Lighthall, who has gone on to work in small business lending. Plunkard said he had initially chosen the southeastern Vermont area by looking at three general locations in the U.S. when he was first looking for a new job, and then putting his finger down on a map. Not long afterward, he received a job offer, and the family packed up and moved to the Ludlow area. Nearly 40 years later, Plunkard, a Cavendish resident and former small business owner with 30 employees, has plans to boost tourism, partner with the state, and bring in new business opportunities to downtown Springfield. “I really appreciate small business in town,” he said. Plunkard said in a candid interview on Friday, Oct. 28 that he has lived in the region since 1978, with the exception of four years living in Calgary, Alberta for work. He works as a landscape architect and consultant, and works part-time, weekday mornings, at SOM. Plunkard has worked in a multitude of downtown projects, including in 22 towns and cities in Vermont, seven in New Hampshire, six in Maine, and many more in Massachusetts, New York, Florida, Virginia, Mississippi, Texas and Canada. The family moved to Cavendish in 1980. His wife of 44 years, Lindsay, taught school in Cavendish and both have been involved in volunteerism. She developed the “Respect Club” several years ago that has since won students gubernatorial awards, he said. The couple has two sons, one in Calgary and one in Cavendish, and four grandchildren. Plunkard said that in the past four decades, he has seen a great deal of change. For example, he said he could recall when Penelope’s — now an accountant’s office — had people “lined up outside,” and Springfield had the highest per-capita income in the state. Plunkard said that his job as SOM’s executive director includes business promotion, assistance with permitting and buildings, funding, helping business owners network with other people in the community, and regional marketing. “Overall, I just want to grow the community,” he said. Plunkard said he feels Springfield has “kind of lost” the regional market with the development of “big box” stores, and that it may be difficult to bring back. Downtown revitalization and local, small business economic development can help provide people with more disposable income and a place to spend that income, he said. Springfield has gone through a sort of rebranding starting a few years ago, promoting the phrase “Springfield Reinvented,” which is still on promotional and tourism materials. “We need to put our heads together and reinvent things that are happening to the town,” he said. That reinvention, and aspects to focus on, will include education, housing, the needs of workers, and open and green spaces around restaurants and businesses, he said. Plans include focusing on people that live out of town and on the “travel market,” because with tourist destinations, people tend to stay an average of four hours and then move on, he said. Plunkard said he envisions new tourism and economic development initiatives that include partnerships with the state, and links to other nearby towns. One of his goals is to “link together” Springfield with Bellows Falls, Chester, White River Junction and other nearby historical communities, “so we’re not cannibalizing each other.” He also wants nearby communities to work together to look at “the whole experience,” he said. He also wants to look into job-sharing, where local merchants get together and pitch in to help one another so employees can take holidays off or cover each other for a few hours. Joint marketing existed much more in past years than it does now, and he hopes to bring it back as storefronts start to fill up, he said. Part of his plans include a proposed tourism donation-ticket system in which a donor to a museum or historical society would receive a ticket to visit a large circuit of historical museums in the Connecticut River Valley. Another idea he has is to bring a tourism focus to local waterfalls by purchasing laser light show equipment that could potentially draw tourists to shows with seasonally changing production themes such as Christmas, Disney characters, and holidays. Though Plunkard has only been in office for two weeks, he said he hopes to meet with an architect next week on the Woolson Block and other downtown projects and retail ideas. He is also looking into developing the River Walk pathway through the downtown, possibly with a cantilevering “overlook” walkway over the river, to tie it in with the falls as a tourist destination. Plunkard’s office hours will be 9 a.m. to 1 p.m., Monday through Friday, and by appointment.
Now it's more like Mayberry LSD, but seriously, Mr. Plunkard does hit on a very important point; a successful downtown requires people with "some disposable income." Public housing, methadone clinics and the like DO NOT create this environment. People with "disposable income" will very likely move to a town without these things, leaving Springfield to the dregs, and those who profit from them.
ReplyDeleteMayberry? Well golly, Mr Plunkard, WELCOME. We need some help.
ReplyDeleteMore public housing on Main Street is NOT going to bring more people with disposable income. The town fathers have really blown it on the Woolson Block. Only time will tell if the SHA turns out to be the "savior" our local officials think it is going to be.
ReplyDeleteEvery major city in America tore down their low income housing projects 20 years ago. High crime and drugs were the reasons. Yet, here in Springfield, they're creating more. The experiment has failed, time to move on.
ReplyDeleteI ran for selectboard saying that Springfield is in a very advantageous position to attract very smart people with disposable income, and I was defeated by a 2-1 margin. If we do not build it, they will not come. So, let's start attracting those people instead of complaining about people who seem to be already here.
ReplyDeleteChuck, the smart people you are referring to accumulated their disposable income by making intelligent choices. That would preclude relocating to Springfield.
DeleteThe major obstacle is demographics. This is a community of lazy, selfish, embittered, liberals. A legion of unemployable parasites that by voting for every conceivable amenity have placed a crushing burden on local home owners. A burden so great, young people are flocking elsewhere and property values continue to fall.
Hardly need to mentioned having one of the worst ranked schools in the state. So explain to me why anyone with ample, disposable income would relocate here?
Another idea he has is to bring a tourism focus to local waterfalls by purchasing laser light show equipment that could potentially draw tourists to shows with seasonally changing production themes such as Christmas, Disney characters, and holidays.
ReplyDeleteAlways focused on the garnish and empty calories, but never a main course. Springfield will continue to starve until it attracts businesses that can hire and employ professionals and pay well. SOM, SRDC, and all the other false prophets on the town's file have contributed little but hot air and self-promoting dribble.
I'm a retired professional with "some disposable income." Let me give you my perspective. When most young (or old) professionals come to this town, and they stop at the traffic light downtown, this is what they'll see. A battered street leading past a crumbling building (Parks and Woolson) and on one side of the street, a dishevelled man dressed in camo from head to dirty toe, glaring at them. On the other corner, an emaciated, tattoo covered woman with green hair pushing a shopping cart. On another corner, an elderly woman talking to someone who isn't there. And when the light turns green, they'll hit the gas, and they won't look back until they hit the interstate. I looked past these things, and decided to stay, for now. Most professionals are not that open-minded. If you want to attract professionals with money to spend, you must first do two things. First clean up downtown, and all the roads branching off of it, for at least as far as the eye can see. Two, when we DO move here, don't treat us like carpetbeggers who deserve to be bled of every dime we have; we ARE educated enough to notice, and generally smart enough to avoid being scammed. Seriously, it just pisses us off. If you can't handle that, and if you think that we are all elitist swine, then don't expect anyone with "disposable income" to come here, or stay here; prepare to live in a crumbling old town with no one to blame but yourselves. Have a nice day!
ReplyDeleteWhile it is true that housing projects have elsewhere been a problem for the communities in which they have been located. In Springfield we have to distinguish between housing run by the Housing Authority, and housing run by private slumlords. The Housing Authority projects have not been the problem. The same Housing Authority led partnership that acquired and rebuilt the theater with housing upstairs, is the partnership which acquired the Woolson Block. If they do as good a job with the Woolson Block as they did with the theater, it will be beneficial to Springfield's Downtown. The alternative was potentially to have another private owner continue the problems that we had with the Woolson Block. The Housing Authority run facilities downtown are not and have not been the problem, the problem in the Town has been landlords like the prior owner of the Woolson Block.
ReplyDeleteWhile I heartily agree that private slumlords are a major problem, I disagree just as heartily that low income housing downtown is a good idea. The solution is, and I quote, "disposable income." People on welfare HAVE NONE. Do I think that the poor should be left on the street? Absolutely not! I am simply questioning the wisdom of putting them downtown. Why not turn the Woolson Block into condos managed by SHA? Owner occupation will create the stability, AND the disposable income that will make downtown prosperous. Might even generate a profit. There are many properties around town that could be used for low income housing, if you must. I may sound like a snob, but the main reason most people work their butts off and go to college, etc. is to AVOID low income housing, whether it's living in it, or living next door to it.
Delete