Springfield Family Dollar |
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/us/dollar-store-plans-divide-vermont-residents.html
The New York Times
May 13, 2012
Vermont Towns Have an Image, and They Say Dollar Stores Aren’t Part of It
By ABBY GOODNOUGH
CHESTER, Vt. — Almost two decades after the National Trust for Historic Preservation put the entire state of Vermont on its list of endangered sites, citing big-box developments as a threat to its signature greenness, towns like this one are now sizing up a new interloper: the chain dollar store.
While Wal-Mart has managed to open only four stores in Vermont and Target still has none, more than two dozen Dollar General, Dollar Tree and Family Dollar stores have cropped up around the state. All three companies are thriving in the bad economy — between them, they have more than 20,000 outlets nationwide, selling everything from dog treats to stain remover and jeans to pool toys. Their spread through Vermont, with its famously strict land-use laws, has caught chain-store opponents off guard.
Shawn Cunningham, a resident here in Chester who is fighting Dollar General’s plan to open down the street from the town common, said that since dollar stores tend to be much smaller than big-box stores, they are often not barred by local zoning rules meant to keep sprawl in check.
“It’s not like you’re bringing in a 100,000-square-foot supercenter,” said Mr. Cunningham, who started a group, Smart Growth Chester, to fight the Dollar General proposal.
So far, the battle has been in vain; the town’s Development Review Board narrowly voted last month to let Dollar General open a 9,100-square-foot store on South Main Street as long as it agreed to 35 conditions, including that it use wood clapboard siding and keep its shopping carts inside.
The project could still be scuttled under Act 250, a state law that empowers regional boards to reject development based on environmental, aesthetic and other criteria. Mr. Cunningham said his group would also file an appeal with the environmental division of Vermont Superior Court.
Supporters of Dollar General’s plan to open in Chester — a town in rural southern Vermont, near the New Hampshire border — say that the store would expand the tax base and keep residents from having to drive to larger towns for whatever Chester’s lone grocery store does not provide.
But Mr. Cunningham and other opponents say that the Dollar General, which has opened 15 stores in Vermont in recent years, including one in Springfield, less than eight miles away, will be the beginning of the end for what might best be described as Chester’s Vermontiness. They theorize that second-home owners will abandon the town rather than abide a discount chain store, tourists in search of a bucolic escape will avoid it and Lisai’s Market, the beloved local grocery store, will be forced out of business.
“People come here and stay at the inns and eat at the restaurants not because we have Disney World but because we have Chester,” said Claudio Veliz, an architect who moved here from New York. “That is the hull of our boat, and Dollar General wants to put its fist right through the hull.”
Citizen groups have also opposed dollar stores in other states, including in New Hampshire, New Mexico, California and Indiana. But such battles can be particularly trenchant in Vermont, with its tourism-dependent economy and fierce protection of its landscape. In Franklin County, opponents fought a proposed Wal-Mart for almost 20 years until the Vermont Supreme Court finally ruled in favor of the project last summer.
Chester, with 3,000 residents, has a number of homegrown businesses, many located in Victorian houses along Main Street. But there is little in the way of generic commercial architecture here — a selling point that drew residents like Mr. Veliz and Mr. Cunningham, who moved his family here from Baltimore in 2004.
“Most of the people in Chester now are people who have come from someplace else,” Mr. Cunningham said. “It’s like a lot of Vermont. Why come to a place like this only to have it turn into the kind of place you were trying to leave?”
Nodding to that concern, the Development Review Board is requiring Dollar General to use certain materials — the wood clapboard siding, for example, instead of a vinyl alternative that the company wanted. Dollar General on its own proposed a building with a peaked roof, as well as a cupola and a faux hayloft door.
In their decision approving the project, board members noted that a retail store was an “allowed use” in the part of town where Dollar General wants to open. They also said that, by using wood siding, the store would meet a zoning requirement that new buildings “adhere harmoniously to the overall New England architectural appearance” of the town.
Tawn Earnest, a spokeswoman for Dollar General, said the company had a long history in small towns and rural communities, often serving customers who have few retail options. Opposition to Dollar General, which is based in Goodlettsville, Tenn., is “a rare exception,” Ms. Earnest said, adding, “We have been very thoughtful in the placement and design of the store to benefit Chester.”
Paul Bruhn, executive director of the Preservation Trust of Vermont, said opposition to dollar stores has sprung up in at least four other towns in the state. Mr. Bruhn’s group, which seeks to protect what it calls “the essential character of Vermont,” has been tracking the spread of dollar stores since 2010; it provides grant money to citizens’ groups that oppose them, including Mr. Cunningham’s.
“The dollar stores have proliferated in a way that seems a little extreme,” Mr. Bruhn said. “One of the things I think is crucial for Vermont, in terms of maintaining this very special brand that we have, is we don’t want to look like Anywhere, U.S.A. And homegrown businesses are a crucial piece of that.”
The spread of dollar stores has come during a period of decline of the general store, a Vermont institution that in many towns served as a meeting place and all-purpose emporium. This week, the Barnard General Store, not far from Chester, closed after 180 years. Its owners cited the twin blows of Tropical Storm Irene, which badly flooded parts of the state last summer, and a nearly snowless winter that kept skiers away.
Lonnie Lisai, whose family owns Lisai’s Market, said he was already strategizing about how to survive if the Dollar General store opens. A lunchtime salad bar, a selection of fancy cheeses and lower-cost alternatives to popular brands are in the offing, he said.
“If you pay a buck over at Dollar General and you’re going to pay a buck eighty-nine here, it’s, boy, what do you tell the customer?” Mr. Lisai said. “I can’t compete. And hopefully they’ll understand that.”
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteToo much of Vermont continues to live in denial of the modern age, with visions of Norman Rockwell innocence obscuring their pathways to economic progress. Sure, it would be nice to be able to afford to retain the general stores and small town charm, but the facts are that the service based economy that Vermont instituted under Kunin is unable to generate the wealth and well paying jobs for locals to be able to prosper. As it is, many of them are barely subsisting, and the future prospects don't hold much "hope" of improvement or "change" for the better.
ReplyDeleteIt'd be funny if it weren't so sad that some people think the 'modern age' and economic growth has anything to do with the insurgence of national chains that are purely profit motivated and are based on the distributing the cheapest goods made overseas and being sold by the lowest paid, no benefit, part-time employees.
ReplyDeleteObscured vision continues to live in la la land.
DeleteHey new vision are you talking about another ski area coming in and raping the mountain sides along with having the lowest paid, no benefit, part-time employees. If this were put in close to Chester I'll bet you would support it. If your no benefit, part-time employee can save a few cents by shopping at a dollar store why is that not a good thing?
DeleteI think for some towns the Dollar Stores are innappropriate, but for Springfield which has for the most part lost its general stores except for a few markets that deal more in fresh meat, etc. It probably makes sense since the only alternative for this type of product is Shaw's which is expensive. I don't think they compete much with the places like the COOP -- they really are only competing with Shaw's. But, that is a completely different story for the small towns which are served solely by general stores...there they can do damage to the Vermont brand of lifestyle.
ReplyDeleteSadly every time there is an article like this the opponents are transplants from the city who came here for an idyllic lifestyle. Unfortunately, hardworking Vermonters, who choose to live here, not only because of Vermont's beauty and peacefulness but because it's the place our our birth or our family anscestry, need certain ammenaties. The Springfield Ames was one of the only in the country still making a profit when the company closed up shop...so now, with the other national chains not being able to get a foot in the door, I have to travel to Claremont for many things that I can not afford to buy on a regular basis in Springfield because the lack of price competition allows stores like Shaws to over charge for things. I can think of a lot better things to do with the hour of drive time once a week...but it is what it is, when you're trying to scrape together a living for your family...
ReplyDeleteI agree about Ames, except that seems to be the case with the large corporate stores, it doesn't matter that one store is making a profit -- its fate is tied to the parent company.
Delete(I should add that I'm not personally a fan of $ Stores...there has to be a reasonable option in between that and the high priced stores we are stuck with)
ReplyDeleteWhy can't they put it where Zachary's is located. That place has been empty and doesn't fit the landscape anyway. If they put a new building there with wood siding, etc, it would look better than the empty Zachary's building and empty, overgrown lot.
ReplyDeleteBut I have to say, dollar stores are just kind of gross, and the Dollar General in Springfield doesn't have very good deals if you compare prices.
I drove by the new Family Dollar in Walpole (on Rt 12, north of Pinnacle View) for the first time today. I was surprised at how 'modest' it looked. Although I'd vote against a Dollar Store moving in if I had a choice, I gotta say, the store in Walpole didn't look all that bad.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately they built that one on very fertile farm land that was in use by Pete's Stand, and next to a farm house that was owned by this wonderful old couple who passed away years ago. They would have hated seeing their property used like that.
DeleteDon't we ALREADY have 2 of them?
ReplyDeleteNext will be pawn shops, tattoo parlors and bail bonds offices. We have the prison, we have a toxic wood plant coming in and we have a haven for mentally challenged individuals. This town is going downward so fast it is like a toilet flushing. Hmm I wonder why?
You know you can leave at any time right?
Deletebuh bye...
The dollar store business shines a light on Springfield and unfortunately a harsh one. Time Magazine's Brad Tuttle put out an article yesterday about the dollar stores and sadly eviserated Springfield. Here's the relevant paragraph.
ReplyDelete"Dollar General already operates more than a dozen stores in Vermont, including one that’s a 10-minute drive from Chester, in Springfield. Springfield is the kind of town where one would expect a dollar store: It’s a down-on-its-luck former manufacturing hub on the river near the New Hampshire border. There are several fast food chains and strip malls in town. For the most part, the only tourists visiting Springfield are just passing through, en route to cuter places."
I'm a flatlander and I really love living here in Springfield. This is not the kind of press that we need. At the same time, I can understand the critique. Notwithstanding Tuttle's condescending vitriol, a drive down Main St. does not inspire awe. Many of the buildings are really beat up and in need of at the least... paint. Bicycles hang from porches with for sale signs, there are piles of mattresses next to the post office on the side of the multi-family unit and of course the painful eyesore building (now with mural).
http://moneyland.time.com/2012/05/14/where-dollar-stores-are-still-not-welcome/
Holy cow.
DeleteYeah, the article is a bit over the top, though it has some truth...trying to figure out where the other strip mall was...and the multiple fast food chains...is Friendly's considered a fast food chain, if so somebody forgot to inform them about "fast"...having one McDonald's does not constitute several fast food chains in my book compared to towns outside of Vermont. Springfield has its problems, don't think having a Dollar Store and a General Dollar are significant...the whole State doesn't have to appeal to granola snobs.
Delete"several fast food chains" What?? Friendly's and McDonalds. Where are the rest of them? I'd hate to see what they call the amount in Claremont or the "big city" of West Lebanon!
DeleteThe Time Magazine article and the NY Times article were published at the same day, likely due to the efforts of Cynthia Praire and husband Shaun Cunningham. The pair are Dollar General opponents and representatives of the non-native population of Chester.
DeleteApparently they are also part of the NIMBY (Not In My BackYard) group.
Richard K. I live in the building you speak of next to the post office. There are no piles of mattresses here. Yes, when you wrote this the neighbors upstairs were moving and were having a moving sale. They used a twin mattress and sheet and wrote MOVING SALE 3RD FLOOR on it and had it out front for a couple days. It is the only mattress I have seen, so don't know where you saw the piles of mattresses... Also, the plaza is the only "mall" in Springfield. Yeah, there used to be a smaller mini mall in the People's United Bank building downtown years ago, but nothing like a "strip mall." I have lived here pretty much all my life and the only fast food place has always been McDonalds.. So, no disrespect, just wondering if you have actually seen these places or are you confusing Springfield with another town?
Deleteeven thou you deleted my comment, dosent make it less true, what happen to freedom of speech, and its not like a swore or was lieing
ReplyDeletedo you mean lying?
DeleteGood for you @ 9:27. When did you become the 'Spelling Bee' champion? I'm just happy residents can voice an opinion. ALL RESIDENTS!
DeleteUnfortunately, this no-good blog isn't the place to do it. There's a REASON newspapers....since the inception of our nation....require people to SIGN their names.
Write to the dope controlling this blog (see address at bottom) and demand accountability....just like REAL newspapers do!
First read what the retired editor of WashingtonPost.com has to say about anonymous comments:
Deletehttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/04/08/AR2009040803248.html
Dear Admin,
DeleteI get what the author is trying to say about anonymous comments, but the problem I have with comments on news sites such as this or the WP or the NYT is that in most cases they are written by the authors and editors of said article or newspaper.
Yup, that is right, it is the journalist or "admin" creating the most inciting and angry comments to elicit a response from others. Think about it, when you read an article on a cite, you would only read it once to get the information and most likely never comeback. With the news sites and sites like this getting paid by advertising on each page, they get paid more if they get mor the more page views. If you are just going once to read the story they aren't going to get paid very much. BUT, if they can drive you to come back over and over again to read these vile and angry comments then they are compensated more. Follow the money people.
What is even funnier is they this site is set up there is no way to even tell if the people leaving their names are in fact the real person. Mr. Admin, how do i know Ethan Mcnaughton is in fact Ethan Mcnaughton or Chris Coughlin is in fact Chris Coughlin.
But, I am very sure that DB is in fact a Dbag.
dont really care what some editor has to say about anonymous comments,yes i meant lying,was thinking and typing, so omg i miss spelt, it's the end of the world.if you didn't want anonymous comments,why set it up so people can,
ReplyDeleteI read the article about anonymity. It was enlightening. There are many people who choose not to reveal their identity for various reasons. Some do not post their names because they choose to not be harassed over a difference of opinion. Some because of death threats for revealing the truth. I can agree that here (this blog spot) seems agressive at times and I can see where the fear of being who we are is greater than being someone unidentified. People should have closure when they are presenting a fact or idea that they are anonymous and they shouldn't have to worry about the consequences of someone finding out their true identity. For fear they will be shot or what have you. People should be able to post opinions based on facts without being ridiculed or called stupid. Everyone should be heard whether or not, they choose to be anonymous. And an FYI for the admin. I went to your anon tracker website you have and it says that I am in a whole different state and the IP address is not correct. Yes, the browser and OS are right. ;) Just thought I would let you know.
ReplyDeleteI am having a hard time figuring out how many "Anonymous" folks are on this site. Or are they all the same person? Could initials be printed rather than "anonymous" or a way to figure out how many folks are responding to an article?
ReplyDelete