Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Board faulted for lack of leadership on wood-chip plant

The Select Board was sharply criticized Monday for a lack of leadership on the proposed wood-fired power plant in North Springfield.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20130116/NEWS02/701169923

10 comments :

  1. Dideye STutters1/16/13, 1:45 PM

    Uh, maybe that is because BIOMASS IS BAD.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Accusing the Springfield Selectboard of a lack of leadership is like accusing a duck of having feathers! Yep, it walks like a duck. Yep, it swims like a duck. Yep, it quacks like a duck. How about that. It is a duck! Such ashame, the very same leaderless selectboard that is giving North Springfield a nice biomass plant has also bestowed a nice prison and costly wreck center and leaky police station on Springfield. Be the N. Spfld NIMBYs were highly in favor of those blessings. So what's the problem? Don't like the taste of your own medicine?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So if you say it makes it so? What makes you think that you can name who voted for the prison or wreck center. For that matter the rebuilding of the old Fellows plant was done with our monies. Who is paying to have the lights on 24/7 in that “museum”?


      Delete
    2. Oh, you mean that unfinished project along the Black River? The one that is only partially filled with tenants and can now only proceed on a month to month basis because it is now completely reliant on the tenants' rent checks to fund the remainder of the renovation? You mean the project that is drawing off other properties for the tenants it actually does have? Ah, the brilliance of Springfield, the Titanic town that continues to shuffle the deck chairs and build great halls in which the band can play on!

      Delete
  3. Aethelred the Unready1/16/13, 5:18 PM

    Courageous leadership would have been for them to be more vociferous in their support of the biomass plant. But there is a fear amongst most of the business community against voicing their support of the plant because of the potential retaliation and attacks by NOSAG. Most progressives that want to grow the grand list support the plant.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm sorry, did you say "retaliation" by NOSAG? What are they going to retaliate with? Are they going to threaten to take their huge incomes and piles of wealth that they've accumulated through their high paying jobs in the Springfield economy and go elsewhere? NOSAG = NO LEVERAGE

      Delete
  4. maybe beijing can adopt springfield as its sister city. In beijing there was a factory fire this week where no one noticed it was on fire for 3 days because they couldnt see the smoke through the smog. you want to smell what wood burning is like. come over the ct river valley on still days. its chocking, gets in your close, in your house. north springfield is in for real treat on some days. on other days the cloud will loft over to the valley and hang out. after that we can enjoy the soot, the trucks. then we can pay to rebuild the bridges they are hammering on day in and day out. the icing on the cake is giving up one half of our fresh water supply to the project. then they send super heated water back into the eco. hatch some good diddy mo and send it to the rivers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You likely emit more pollution from you respective orifices than the biomass plant will, since it will actually employ emission controls. Your fears are misplaced, misguided, and completely irrational. But thank you for your efforts to further sabotage Springfield's economic future! Maybe NOSAG can send you a Certificate of Appreciation.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for posting completely false data to support the biomess plant. Congrats! Lying now about the harmful effects sounds just like the tobacco and asbestos companies did a few years back.

      Delete
  5. S.32 - by Senator Philip Baruth is going to be withdrawn thanks to the good people of Vermont phoning and writing their representatives and showing up at the capital supporting the 2nd Amendment -

    http://7d.blogs.com/offmessage/2013/01/baruth-to-withdraw-bill-banning-assault-weapons.html

    Don't get complacent Vermonters

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts