http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150123/NEWS02/701239975
Published January 23, 2015 in the Rutland Herald Select Board approves $10.7 million budget By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD — The Springfield Select Board has approved a new town budget for the fiscal year 2015-2016, which includes a proposed 2.7 percent increase in taxes. The $10,766,061 million spending plan comes with some pain; the town’s oft-discussed efforts to put more money into its neglected roads and highway was a late casualty. The amount to be raised through local property taxes will be $8,780,931, which is a 2.7 percent increase over last year’s tax levy. Making the Select Board job more difficult than usual was the fact that this budget included the first annual payment of $190,000 on $30 million the town recently spent on water, sewer and stormwater system improvements. The plan to spend $500,000 a year on paving and $100,000 on road reconstruction didn’t survive the budget sessions, as they were cut to $260,000 for paving and $50,000 for construction. It was the public works budget of $2.3 million that sustained the bulk of the cuts to bring down the proposed budget increase to what the Select Board said was a manageable level. The vote was unanimous in support of the budget and will be voted on by residents March 3, which is Town Meeting Day. The Select Board had a late addition to the budget, in the form of a $90,000 estimate to make foundation repairs to the Springfield Community Center, which is the home to the Springfield Parks and Recreation Department, including the senior center. The board took $30,000 from the department’s capital reserve fund, earmarked for a new pickup and ongoing repairs to the town’s pool, to offset the cost of the foundation repairs. The board also cut about $5,500 from the Springfield Town Library’s energy efficiency lighting project, bringing the total down to $10,000. The Select Board had heard from the town’s budget committee, which at the last minute had recommended an across-the-board cut in all budgets of 1.8 percent. The budget committee also said it recommended a town meeting article calling for a separate appropriation of $100,000 to be used to repair the town’s dilapidated sidewalks. But the focus was on the public works department’s budget, which as Selectman David Yesman said, had the biggest budget and the biggest request of $2.3 million, and thus was the obvious target. “Let’s make some big cuts,” Yesman said at one point in frustration. The Select Board did split over a proposal to cut $40,000 earmarked toward the purchase of a used rescue truck for the Springfield Fire Department. The truck carries equipment. Yesman said the truck did have some rust, but it worked fine. Yesman and fellow Selectman Peter MacGillivray and George McNaughton voted for the $40,000 cut. Opposing the cut were Chairman Kristi Morris and Selectwoman Stephanie Thompson. Town Manager Tom Yennerell asked Public Works Director Jeffrey Strong which of his budgets could best survive cuts, and Strong urged the Select Board not to cut his equipment budget. Everett Hammond, chairman of the budget committee, said the budget, as proposed, would have called for a 6.1 percent increase in taxes, something he said the committee would not support. He said the committee believed a 2.9 percent tax increase was something “that would fly.”
The select board doesn't approve the budget, the voters do. They can only recommend it.
ReplyDeleteWhere can we get a line-item budget to review so we know what we are voting on?
ReplyDeletei want to know why we don't get to vote on the water/sewer budget,that is just forced on us
ReplyDeleteI don't know about anyone else, but my salary CERTAINLY does not increase at the crazy percentages that the budget increases every year.
ReplyDeleteYou aren't in a union, are you?
DeleteProbably not in a union, which is why they still have a job!
DeleteDon't speak too loud,there are people reading this who are very sensitive about why the shops closed down.....You know, the low IQ ones.
DeleteSpringfield muddles through another budget cycle, ensuring that mediocrity shall continue to rule the day and the town's infrastructure to decay...
ReplyDeleteI would like to know what town employees pay toward their health insurance. Maybe THAT is something that can be looked into to offset some of the increases that are unavoidable. I heard they don't pay much. That is unrealistic in this day and age.
ReplyDeleteBob Forguites said that if Vermont went to single payer health care, the town's health coverage budget would drop by half a million dollars.
DeleteWhy not work to get everybody in Springfield the sort of health coverage you'd like your family to have?
some towns around us still give employees 100 % health isurance
DeleteChuck, there's nothing preventing "everybody in Springfield" to work as hard as many of the rest of us do to qualify for their own healthcare insurance. You need to get over your aversion to the concept of earning your own keep and abusing the power of government for the purpose of seizing the wealth of others to redistribute it to society's free riders.
Delete"some towns around us still give employees 100 % health insurance"
Deletebull!....NAME ONE!
6:30, it seems you don't know anybody like Heather Loughlin up in Ludlow, who was a hard worker in middle management at one of the local ski slopes. She had health insurance which treated her illness until she was too sick to work, and then she was bled dry by COBRA, and then she was poor. Two years of bouncing around from free clinic to free clinic hoping the docs would be able to give her their free samples to at least abate the symptoms, finally getting on Medicaid after she had nothing left of her life's earnings except the clothes she wore, back to living with her folks, sick as a dog-- and then unable to find a competent MD who accepted Medicaid. So, you can stop romanticizing about the superior physical condition of all American workers.
DeleteThat's the first point.
The second point is that there are a hell of a lot of workers who are so beaten down to begin with, they're grateful just to be paid minimum wage for a 30-hour-a-week (so the employer doesn't have to provide them insurance) job. While you and I are enjoying the holidays with our family and friends, these are the ones who are staffing the convenience stores when we pull in for gas on our way to church or the family reunion. Ask any of them if they're getting paid time and a half for working a holiday. You don't think they're not earning their own keep?
That's the second point.
I believe they pay NOTHING for health insuracne
Deletethey do pay for there health insurance
Delete6:30, here's from a letter to the Valley News from Dr. Anna Carey:
Delete"C.C. and I started talking. Over the past month, he’d experienced darkening and diminishing urine, clay-colored stools, fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, parched mouth and windedness. His vitals weren’t good. He had a rapidly irregular heart rate of 130 beats per minute, and a low blood pressure of 98/52. With the aid of a urine test, ECG and chest X-ray, I knew C.C. was severely ill with kidney disease, jaundice and atrial fibrillation. I could only broadly diagnose, however. He clearly needed more in-depth evaluation: immediate blood work, an abdominal CAT scan and urgent measures to replenish his dehydrated body. But, as C.C. reminded me, he didn’t have insurance. He and his wife own a store, and he earns extra income doing carpentry on the side. Costly health insurance premiums, deductibles and co-payments were not things that he could afford. He asked me whether he could delay treatment, and potentially emergency hospitalization, until he was able to get insurance."
You think he's not a hard worker?
Don't vote........I'm 30, never have voted and never will. Ultimately, it isn't up to the voters. Doesn't people know it's all corrupt bs!??
ReplyDeleteAh! The very person the Republican national party counts on! You should ask Reince Priebus to send you a certificate.
ReplyDeleteIf you think it needs cleaning up, why not join one of the town committees? There are various ones with vacancies, and you could make a difference rather than just feel like a powerless victim.
Said the liberal extremist who winced at the low Democrat turnout in November 2014 that lost the U.S. Senate for them! LOL.
DeleteWell, I'm just trying to move 4:58 up from powerless victim to the next level: political participant who expresses his/her anger by not voting, which is what Democrats usually do...
DeleteThat's a laugh, but so typical of a condescending liberal who views everybody as a victim in need of government assistance!
DeleteAnd they're off! Breaking to the inside is Inevitable Increase, followed closely by Municipal Meltdown, Pet Programs, and Must Have. In the middle of the pack, Overburdened Taxpayer is struggling for position, but is being pinned against the rail by Conflict of Interest, Nonessential Expenditures, and Window Dressing, with Infrastructure Improvement fading fast. As they come to the first turn, it’s Inevitable Increase by two lengths, with Municipal Meltdown, Pet Programs, and Must Have holding steady. Overburdened Taxpayer has fallen back, while Conflict of Interest, Nonessential Expenditures, and Window Dressing move ahead toward the backstretch. Showing signs of life and moving steadily through the middle of the pack is Dole Outs, clearly beginning to hit a stride. As they come through the third turn, it’s Municipal Meltdown and Inevitable Increase neck and neck, with Window Dressing now challenging for third against Pet Programs, Conflict of Interest, and Nonessential Expenditure. Infrastructure Improvement has fallen off the pace and Overburdened Taxpayer appears to be struggling severely. Coming down the stretch it’s Municipal Meltdown and Inevitable Increase, with Nonessential Expenditures and Dole Outs now gaining on the outside. It’s Inevitable Increase, Municipal Meltdown, Nonessential Expenditures, and Dole Outs all now running abreast, with Pet Program, Conflict of Interest, Window Dressing and Must Have forming a second group. Infrastructure Improvement is struggling to maintain the pace, but Overburdened Taxpayer has pulled up on the last turn and is clearly hobbling on only three legs. At the wire it’s a photo finish between Inevitable Increase and Dole Outs – just too close to call. Nonessential Expenditures, Pet Program, Conflict of Interest, Window Dressing and Must Have follow them across the line, while Infrastructure Improvement continues to trot slowly down the homestretch, clearly out of the money. At the fourth turn, Overburdened Taxpayer is now down on the track and veterinarians are examining the severity of its injuries. As we watch Inevitable Increase and Dole Outs move toward the paddock area awaiting a review of the photo finish, we’ve just received word that a Public Works Department dump truck and front end loader have now been positioned off turn four, as it appears that authorities have elected to euthanize Overburdened Taxpayer. This comes as yet another blow to The Working Man Stables, whose entries in this race over the years have frequently met with disdain, if not outright disaster! Looking ahead to the next heat, odds makers have pegged Waste, Fraud, and Abuse as the favorites to win, place, and show!
ReplyDeleteI'm guessing you're not familiar with using paragraphs to make your point ... not that there was much of a point to any of it.
DeleteLook-up the definition of Aspergers and the comment written by 4:15 PM will be used as an example. Get some help!
DeleteReminds me of my bi-polar brother, who was capable of doing that sort of thing. Entertaining, but scary if you had to consider the source. But in my opinion, a good exercise in creative writing.
DeleteThis has nothing to do with asparagus! LOL
DeleteSame race, different track!!
DeleteIsn't talking about someone's medical condition on line for the world to see a violation of the Hipi law???
ReplyDelete