Friday, January 23, 2015

Select Board approves $10.7 million budget

The Springfield Select Board has approved a new town budget for the fiscal year 2015-2016, which includes a proposed 2.7 percent increase in taxes.
http://www.rutlandherald.com/article/20150123/NEWS02/701239975

29 comments :

  1. The select board doesn't approve the budget, the voters do. They can only recommend it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Where can we get a line-item budget to review so we know what we are voting on?

    ReplyDelete
  3. i want to know why we don't get to vote on the water/sewer budget,that is just forced on us

    ReplyDelete
  4. I don't know about anyone else, but my salary CERTAINLY does not increase at the crazy percentages that the budget increases every year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory1/23/15, 6:01 PM

      You aren't in a union, are you?

      Delete
    2. Probably not in a union, which is why they still have a job!

      Delete
    3. Don't speak too loud,there are people reading this who are very sensitive about why the shops closed down.....You know, the low IQ ones.

      Delete
  5. Springfield muddles through another budget cycle, ensuring that mediocrity shall continue to rule the day and the town's infrastructure to decay...

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would like to know what town employees pay toward their health insurance. Maybe THAT is something that can be looked into to offset some of the increases that are unavoidable. I heard they don't pay much. That is unrealistic in this day and age.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory1/23/15, 6:03 PM

      Bob Forguites said that if Vermont went to single payer health care, the town's health coverage budget would drop by half a million dollars.

      Why not work to get everybody in Springfield the sort of health coverage you'd like your family to have?

      Delete
    2. some towns around us still give employees 100 % health isurance

      Delete
    3. Chuck, there's nothing preventing "everybody in Springfield" to work as hard as many of the rest of us do to qualify for their own healthcare insurance. You need to get over your aversion to the concept of earning your own keep and abusing the power of government for the purpose of seizing the wealth of others to redistribute it to society's free riders.

      Delete
    4. "some towns around us still give employees 100 % health insurance"

      bull!....NAME ONE!

      Delete
    5. chuck gregory1/24/15, 6:29 PM

      6:30, it seems you don't know anybody like Heather Loughlin up in Ludlow, who was a hard worker in middle management at one of the local ski slopes. She had health insurance which treated her illness until she was too sick to work, and then she was bled dry by COBRA, and then she was poor. Two years of bouncing around from free clinic to free clinic hoping the docs would be able to give her their free samples to at least abate the symptoms, finally getting on Medicaid after she had nothing left of her life's earnings except the clothes she wore, back to living with her folks, sick as a dog-- and then unable to find a competent MD who accepted Medicaid. So, you can stop romanticizing about the superior physical condition of all American workers.

      That's the first point.

      The second point is that there are a hell of a lot of workers who are so beaten down to begin with, they're grateful just to be paid minimum wage for a 30-hour-a-week (so the employer doesn't have to provide them insurance) job. While you and I are enjoying the holidays with our family and friends, these are the ones who are staffing the convenience stores when we pull in for gas on our way to church or the family reunion. Ask any of them if they're getting paid time and a half for working a holiday. You don't think they're not earning their own keep?

      That's the second point.

      Delete
    6. I believe they pay NOTHING for health insuracne

      Delete
    7. they do pay for there health insurance

      Delete
    8. chuck gregory1/27/15, 1:33 AM

      6:30, here's from a letter to the Valley News from Dr. Anna Carey:

      "C.C. and I started talking. Over the past month, he’d experienced darkening and diminishing urine, clay-colored stools, fatigue, nausea, abdominal pain, parched mouth and windedness. His vitals weren’t good. He had a rapidly irregular heart rate of 130 beats per minute, and a low blood pressure of 98/52. With the aid of a urine test, ECG and chest X-ray, I knew C.C. was severely ill with kidney disease, jaundice and atrial fibrillation. I could only broadly diagnose, however. He clearly needed more in-depth evaluation: immediate blood work, an abdominal CAT scan and urgent measures to replenish his dehydrated body. But, as C.C. reminded me, he didn’t have insurance. He and his wife own a store, and he earns extra income doing carpentry on the side. Costly health insurance premiums, deductibles and co-payments were not things that he could afford. He asked me whether he could delay treatment, and potentially emergency hospitalization, until he was able to get insurance."

      You think he's not a hard worker?

      Delete
  7. Don't vote........I'm 30, never have voted and never will. Ultimately, it isn't up to the voters. Doesn't people know it's all corrupt bs!??

    ReplyDelete
  8. chuck gregory1/23/15, 6:04 PM

    Ah! The very person the Republican national party counts on! You should ask Reince Priebus to send you a certificate.

    If you think it needs cleaning up, why not join one of the town committees? There are various ones with vacancies, and you could make a difference rather than just feel like a powerless victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Said the liberal extremist who winced at the low Democrat turnout in November 2014 that lost the U.S. Senate for them! LOL.

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory1/23/15, 8:15 PM

      Well, I'm just trying to move 4:58 up from powerless victim to the next level: political participant who expresses his/her anger by not voting, which is what Democrats usually do...

      Delete
    3. That's a laugh, but so typical of a condescending liberal who views everybody as a victim in need of government assistance!

      Delete
  9. And they're off! Breaking to the inside is Inevitable Increase, followed closely by Municipal Meltdown, Pet Programs, and Must Have. In the middle of the pack, Overburdened Taxpayer is struggling for position, but is being pinned against the rail by Conflict of Interest, Nonessential Expenditures, and Window Dressing, with Infrastructure Improvement fading fast. As they come to the first turn, it’s Inevitable Increase by two lengths, with Municipal Meltdown, Pet Programs, and Must Have holding steady. Overburdened Taxpayer has fallen back, while Conflict of Interest, Nonessential Expenditures, and Window Dressing move ahead toward the backstretch. Showing signs of life and moving steadily through the middle of the pack is Dole Outs, clearly beginning to hit a stride. As they come through the third turn, it’s Municipal Meltdown and Inevitable Increase neck and neck, with Window Dressing now challenging for third against Pet Programs, Conflict of Interest, and Nonessential Expenditure. Infrastructure Improvement has fallen off the pace and Overburdened Taxpayer appears to be struggling severely. Coming down the stretch it’s Municipal Meltdown and Inevitable Increase, with Nonessential Expenditures and Dole Outs now gaining on the outside. It’s Inevitable Increase, Municipal Meltdown, Nonessential Expenditures, and Dole Outs all now running abreast, with Pet Program, Conflict of Interest, Window Dressing and Must Have forming a second group. Infrastructure Improvement is struggling to maintain the pace, but Overburdened Taxpayer has pulled up on the last turn and is clearly hobbling on only three legs. At the wire it’s a photo finish between Inevitable Increase and Dole Outs – just too close to call. Nonessential Expenditures, Pet Program, Conflict of Interest, Window Dressing and Must Have follow them across the line, while Infrastructure Improvement continues to trot slowly down the homestretch, clearly out of the money. At the fourth turn, Overburdened Taxpayer is now down on the track and veterinarians are examining the severity of its injuries. As we watch Inevitable Increase and Dole Outs move toward the paddock area awaiting a review of the photo finish, we’ve just received word that a Public Works Department dump truck and front end loader have now been positioned off turn four, as it appears that authorities have elected to euthanize Overburdened Taxpayer. This comes as yet another blow to The Working Man Stables, whose entries in this race over the years have frequently met with disdain, if not outright disaster! Looking ahead to the next heat, odds makers have pegged Waste, Fraud, and Abuse as the favorites to win, place, and show!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm guessing you're not familiar with using paragraphs to make your point ... not that there was much of a point to any of it.

      Delete
    2. Look-up the definition of Aspergers and the comment written by 4:15 PM will be used as an example. Get some help!

      Delete
    3. chuck gregory1/27/15, 6:03 PM

      Reminds me of my bi-polar brother, who was capable of doing that sort of thing. Entertaining, but scary if you had to consider the source. But in my opinion, a good exercise in creative writing.

      Delete
    4. This has nothing to do with asparagus! LOL

      Delete
    5. Same race, different track!!

      Delete
  10. Isn't talking about someone's medical condition on line for the world to see a violation of the Hipi law???

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts