Friday, February 6, 2015

Claremont Savings Bank gears up for Vt. location

After months of planning and organizing, Claremont Savings Bank is nearly ready to welcome customers to their new branch in Springfield, Vermont on Monday, Feb. 23.
http://eagletimes.villagesoup.com/p/claremont-savings-bank-gears-up-for-vt-location/1300783

17 comments :

  1. chuck gregory2/6/15, 10:16 AM

    So, Claremont Bank now owns the S&L; the Royal Bank of Scotland owns Citizens Bank; Mascoma owns Chittenden Bank, apparently. Who owns the other banks in town, and what does this mean for Springfielders who are looking for loans to improve their business, their home or their children's prospects in life? What sort of a reputation does Claremont Bank have?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You know Chuck, if people in town have decent credit, I don't believe they need to worry about borrowing money from any institution. If they don't, not so much

    ReplyDelete
  3. chuck gregory2/6/15, 8:16 PM

    Lending to someone whom they thought had "decent credit" was a problem for Bellows Falls back in the early Eighties. Some Italian claiming to have millions showed up, started getting loans for property renewal and decamped, leaving a lot of distress behind him. (Among the flotsam was the building now housing the China Garden, sold to the Tams for $35,000.)

    That's what happens when the lenders didn't know the score

    And when you have a dishonest bank--like the Royal Bank of Scotland, cough, cough-- then you have a predator ready to strip the assets of Springfielders who have good credit.

    Finally, when you have a lender who doesn't know the character of the person with good credit, you have a situation in which good people will be denied for the most short-sighted of reasons. There is probably any number of inventors in Springfield who would have been shot down for financing had the banks not been locally-owned in the days of Precision Valley.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Chuck just can't resist villainizing and sniping at any commercial enterprise. Personal responsibility is a foreign concept to him. The nanny state must govern us to guarantee an equally low standard of living for all...

      Claremont Savings Bank has been a reputable institution for years and many of our parents and grandparents did business with them, and sons and daughters followed in their footsteps with personal and business accounts. We were willing to drive to Claremont to do our banking with them because we enjoyed doing business with them. Having a branch in Springfield is a definite plus!

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory2/7/15, 9:12 PM

      On November 26, 2013, the Daily Mail reported the Royal Bank of Scotland was under investigation for defrauding customers and defrauding its small business customers by driving them into bankruptcy: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2514150/RBS-faces-criminal-probe-Serious-Fraud-office-claims-killed-small-firms-gain.html

      I am glad the S&L has only been bought by a fairly local bank, BUT when Claremont gets bought out by the Bank of Cleveland and then sold off to Citi or Goldman Sachs-- in other words, by some ever-more-remote, Wall-Street-driven entity, the pressure mounts for the locals to produce yet more revenue, usually by firing staff-- their Senior Account Executive got the bum's rush, the same as Holly Farnsworth did-- and eventually stealing from the customers, usually by jacking up the ATM and checking account charges. See what good it does for you to protest them when you don't have somebody like Senator Elizabeth Warren backing you up.

      When Harry Shepard Sr. sold his landfill to CFI, they only kept him on until he refused to generate another $28,000 in revenues (about $84,000 today) because he knew he couldn't generate more customers and he didn't think it was fair to raise his price. Well, it wasn't "his" price any more.

      As RBS got off its US charges with a fine and no admission of wrongdoing, keep your eye on what happens over the next few years. And pray that Claremont doesn't get bought out.

      Right now, the only American bank that Americans can trust in my opinion is the Royal Bank of Canada.

      Delete
    3. chuck gregory2/8/15, 8:34 AM

      PS: Why do we get all bent out of shape at the mention of loss of local control of schools, yet airily dismiss the loss of local control of our banks?

      Delete
    4. Sen. Elizabeth "Fauxcahantas" Warren? Now there's a pillar of integrity!!! You're probably breathlessly awaiting the return of Lyin' Williams to the NBC News anchor desk, too!

      Delete
  4. Holly Farnsworth, the branch manager at the "new" bank has been the branch manager at the "old" bank for years. She's a local person. She knows her customers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. chuck gregory2/7/15, 9:00 PM

      Holly has left to work for the Chester Schools. Her seat has been vacant for about three weeks, and I expect when the new person sits in it, it will burst into flame like the Siege Perilous of Camelot.

      Delete
    2. There are several credit unions in town, each one of them locally owned; One Credit Union, Windsor County South Credit Union, and River Valley Credit Union.

      Delete
    3. Right, and the "old bank" was performing so well under her management that it was ultimately sold to another institution. Here's the beauty of the marketplace - you can choose to do business with whichever bank you want! Freedom of choice. It's a great thing - for everyone except the socialist oppressors, who would prefer that you have no choice!

      Delete
    4. chuck gregory2/10/15, 8:26 PM

      12:51, Holly Farnsworth was hired after the S&L had been sold to Brattleboro S&L, and it hadn't been an S&L in anything but name for at least 30 years before that-- that was when the depositor/owners were cut from the board of directors and lost whatever control they'd had of the course of the institution.

      Claremont Bank is already making its impact felt. With its new paperless processing fee for deposits, my savings account is now earning 0.02% per year, one fifty-sixth of what it had been earning before the sale.

      Anybody who isn't in a credit union is at risk for this sort of treatment-- and worse, if they have a debit card, a bank loan, or a home mortgage taken out in the bubble years.

      12:56, what can you tell us about Elizabeth Warren, and is your source something other than Fox News?

      Delete
  5. Another misrepresentation. Visit the CSB website. Checking and Saving account rates are 0.03% or higher across the board. You've overdramatized the situation once again. Sadly, you won't be able to tune in to your favorite anchor this evening and revel in NBC News' fiction because Lyin' Williams has been suspended. Birds of a feather!

    ReplyDelete
  6. chuck gregory2/11/15, 9:44 PM

    What does the CSB website say about the paperless processing charges? I hope it says the same thing CSB is now putting on my monthly statement. With that charge, my annual rate is now only 2/3ds of what you say it is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apples and oranges... You are earning at least .03%, as advertised, and you obviously agreed to the other fees and charges, so quit sniveling.

      Delete
    2. chuck gregory2/12/15, 7:18 PM

      No, I am not earning the .03%. I am only earning 0.02%.

      So, 5:31, when your bank tells you it is slapping a charge on your account, raising the charge on your checking account and tripling your safe deposit box fee, what do you do to reduce the increases? Or do you just take it like a man?

      Delete
    3. Chuck, 0.03% is 30¢ per year per $1000 (as opposed to 20¢), so it's nothing more than a pittance anyway.

      They also sent out paperwork indicating old Springfield S&L debit cards would be deactivated on Tuesday, Feb. 24, but the new card can't be activated until Mon., Feb. 23.

      As it turns out (contrary to their mailing), the old card will actually be deactivated at the end of the day on the 22nd (before the new card can be activated), NOT the 24th. I'd hate to be travelling somewhere right now and relying on a debit card from them for expenses. An overlap of a couple of weeks should have been provided.

      So far, their actions don't indicate much regard for customers (or providing accurate information).

      Delete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts