Area legislators had a message to their constituents Monday: don’t hate us when we are forced to cut the state budget.
Photos from Springfield Regional Development Corp.
Published February 24, 2015 in the Rutland Herald State budget brings reductions and/or closures By SUSAN SMALLHEER Staff Writer SPRINGFIELD – Area legislators had a message to their constituents Monday: don’t hate us when we are forced to cut the state budget. The state’s hard financial times dominated the legislative forum Monday morning held at the Holiday Inn Express; a half dozen area legislators attended the session, which was attended by about 30 members of the public. Gov. Peter Shumlin has floated the idea of cutting 400 positions in state government. Others have suggested closing the Vermont Veterans Home in Bennington to save costs. Sen. Alice Nitka, D-Windsor, said from an emotional standpoint, she wanted the Veterans Home (which is actually a nursing home) to remain open. But from a strictly financial analysis, she said she would have to support closing it. The state likes the idea of having a nursing home for its ailing veterans, she said, but it is not centrally located, and neighboring states of Massachusetts and New York resist allowing their veterans to use their Medicare dollars in a Vermont facility. The state is currently facing a $112 million budget gap, and each legislator said there was no doubt that reductions were coming, if not the elimination of entire programs. Kristi Morris, chairman of the Springfield Select Board, urged the legislators not to do anything that would directly or indirectly raise the property tax or make doing business along the New Hampshire border any harder. He said that the rooms and meals tax and other “user fees” on wealthy people who come to Vermont’s ski areas, would be a better place to look for revenue. “What do they care if there’s another 10 percent on their bill?” said Morris. Rep. Alice Emmons, D-Springfield, chairwoman of the House Institutions Committee, said that she had never seen such a tight budget year. “It’s such a difficult session,” said Emmons regarding the financial troubles at the Veterans Home and the potential for 400 layoffs of state employees. She said raising the sales tax was looking to be a strong candidate to increase revenues, in addition to the proposed cuts. “It’s going to be very, very difficult,” Emmons warned, noting that the legislative process was going to be a “roller coaster.” Springfield School Superintendent Zachary McLaughlin said he was concerned about Senate Bill 9, which could put tremendous burdens — including felony convictions — on teachers who fail to discover abuse of their students. McLaughlin said a teacher may not catch a sign of abuse, and potentially could from a mere “lapse in judgment” end up being charged with a felony. Nitka said Senate Bill 9, which was written by the legislative task force looking into child abuse last summer, had the support of the committee. She said the provision that McLaughlin mentioned was supported by the committee on a 3-2 vote, and that she was on the losing side. The entire bill will be passed, she said, and it has the strong support of Sen. Richard Sears, D-Bennington, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. It will be passed by the entire Senate, she predicted. What happens in the House, Nitka said, she didn’t know.
Terrified explaining to the parasites that elected her, Emmons cringes admitting the gravy train is running out of other people's money. In retaliation to curtailing wasteful spending on HCRS and dozens of other bureaucracies, she endorses closing a veteran's home. A modest home for the patriots of this nation that paid their dues, and overwhelmingly vote conservative. Despicable Alice, purely despicable!
ReplyDeleteKristi Morris, chairman of the Springfield Select Board, said that the rooms and meals tax and other “user fees” on wealthy people who come to Vermont’s ski areas, would be a better place to look for revenue.
ReplyDelete“What do they care if there’s another 10 percent on their bill?” said Morris.
No wonder no one wants to move to Vermont. Morris thinks that the out of state wealthy should pay for Vermont's lack of good government decisions. Morris is going to regret making that statement and Springfield will suffer from it.
Amen 9:06!
DeleteThe truly wealthy people are hitting the slopes at Aspen and Whistler. The out-of-state families skiing Vermont are largely working stiffs like you and I. Blue collar Joes that ambitiously save to get a weekend away from the human cesspools of LI and NJ.
Go ahead and keep making a visit here even less appealing. Isn't like local Inns are booked solid and flatlanders don't have other options. Hope next time your family visits Fenway Park or Disney the electorate there takes the same view of your financial ability.
Does everyone in politics just get stupid with time?
I agree, Springfield's tourist traffic is zilch which is why Morris doesn't truly understand his statement.
DeleteThank you for the wonderful pictures of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum above!
ReplyDeleteThe number of state employees has increased by over 300 since 2010 when Shumey took office. I'll bet that no one has noticed any particular improvement in the proficiency of the state's governance as a result. Therefore, it should not be difficult to roll the headcount by that number plus another 100. Sixty-one percent (61%) of state employees work in Washington and Chittenden counties (can you say Burlington and Montpelier), so they reap the majority of the economic windfall from state hiring. Drawdowns should have minimal consequence on Springfield, but a significant one on the state's ability to live within its fiscal means without imposing further tax burdens on an already hard-pressed taxpayer base.
Someday, Springfield, maybe you'll actually understand how poorly served you are by Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum and send them packing!
A 10% tax increase on the top 0.16% of Vermont households would end the fiscal shortfall while leaving them with an average household income of over $2.5 million.
DeleteThanks Johnny one-note. It's just as simple as taking from everyone who's better off than you because they're the evil rich and obviously don't deserve what they have. Why don't you lead the way by invoking a self-imposed 10% tax on your $12,000 "surplus" and sending that to the State of Vermont?
DeleteFolks take a minute to read the side article in the right hand column here about the Sergeant at Arms Ouster. Then also read the comments by readers. That's your leadership at work. Please start making your vote count on election day. We need change, badly.
ReplyDeleteWell, nothing to do but count on the old guard to save us from the terrorists! You would think that Vermont would lead the way in showing the rest of the states their elected representatives aren't afraid of the people they are supposed to serve, but no.
Delete