www.eagletimes.com
Selectboard hears options for tackling 'blighted' property By Allan Stein allans@eagletimes.com SPRINGFIELD — Selectboard members on Monday heard options on how to deal with so-called blighted property in Springfield — one of the main goals of the town's ordinance committee. The Springfield Ordinance Committee, comprised of selectboard members George McNaughton and Walter Martone, is considering an ordinance that would prohibit blighted property within school zones. Garrett Baxter, senior staff attorney for the Vermont League of Cities and Towns, gave a presentation on blight reduction practices, laws, town charter amendments and processes to address the issue of property that threatens public health and safety. "I am not here to tell you what to do. I am here to lay out the legal tools," said Baxter. Baxter first described the purpose of emergency health orders. They are administered solely by the town health agent when a building has been declared an immediate public health and safety hazard. A non-emergency health order can be issued by the selectboard to prevent or remove a structure that is deemed a public health and safety hazard. This enforcement tool requires the issuance of a notice of intent to the property owner and it carries the right of appeal to the state Board of Health. Baxter said a proposed Distressed Building Bill currently under House committee review would enable Vermont communities to "decide what to do with commercial buildings that are open to the elements for six months." The bill would apply only to distressed building facades in municipal downtowns and village centers, he said. He said town officials also have the option of creating zoning regulations with specific provisions to address blighted property. Miscellaneous regulatory powers would enable the creation of model ordinances dealing with dangerous or vacant buildings. "It would be imposing on propertery owners the obligation of protectding their own investments," said Baxter. Baxter described other options to limit the existence of blighted property, such as Tax Increment Finance [TIF] districts. These are used to generate tax revenues and stimulate economic development within designated TIF districts. The town also has the option of amending its charter to address blighted property or to authorize the selectboard to create an urban renewal plan linking existing zoning regulations. "I like the urban renewal plan because the selectboard can do it themselves," said McNaughton.
Springfield recidents are so depressed they don't see the "blighted" areas of the town.
ReplyDeleteWhen will this town learn? If Springfield has any hope of a revival, hard difficult decisions need to be made. People will be upset, there will be legal fees, but for the love of all that is right, stand up Springfield.
ReplyDeleteAnother small business has left town and with it a young entrepreneur. Why? Because of the social conditions that exist in our town. It is time to put up a fight.
Support the passing of ordinances that limit blight.
Support the passing of zoning regulations that limit ability for out-of-town landlords to run our community and fill it with vile scum.
Support our schools.
Do not support those organizations that constantly ask for handouts at town meeting without accountability.
Make those who are not productive members of our community feel out of place within Springfield.
Another burden is the APPEALS process.
ReplyDeleteDon't like the selectboard decision? The liberal State will give yet another pass. Poor you, can't keep your house clean. Sob. We'll give you more time.
There appears to be opposition to putting the "blight" issue on the ballot. My guess it will be a three to two vote on the issue. The VLCT presentation was a pretty long rehash of what has been said before. Doubt there will be a majority in favor of letting it on the ballot. Could be wrong, suspect it will come down to which way the Selectman named Peter votes.
ReplyDelete