www.vtdigger.org
VERMONT CONSIDERS BUILDING NEW $140M PRISON FEB. 28, 2017, 11:39 PM BY ELIZABETH HEWITT 10 COMMENTS Gov. Phil Scott says the state should consider a public-private partnership for a new prison. File photo by Elizabeth Hewitt/VTDigger State officials and lawmakers are interested in building a new 800-bed prison in partnership with a private company. The $140 million facility would replace aging state facilities. Opponents say a private company should not be involved in the project. In a report on Vermont’s prisons published last month, the Department of Corrections provided information about the impact of a new prison on the state’s correctional system. The proposal is one of four options under consideration. Lawmakers requested an analysis of the state’s correctional facilities in the capital budget adjustment last year, including new infrastructure. The estimated $140 million construction cost for the new facility could be financed through several different mechanisms, such as bonds or a partnership with a private entity. According to the report, both national private prison companies and local construction firms have expressed interest in a partnership. Under this model, the facility would be built and owned by a private company and leased to the state, which would operate the prison. The proposal described in the report would have 800 beds — almost twice as many as the prison in Newport, which is currently the largest facility in the state. Southeast State Correctional Facility Southeast State Correctional Facility in Windsor. Department of Corrections photo The out-of-state prison program would be almost entirely shut down, though a need for a few out-of-state maximum security beds would still exist. The state would close prisons in Windsor, Swanton and South Burlington, which have the highest per-capita inmate costs in the state. Vermont would be able to bring in about $3 million in revenue by leasing prison beds to the U.S. Marshals Service for federal inmates and detainees. The report also looked at building a new 100-bed unit at the Southern State Correctional Facility in Springfield. In an interview last week about the future of the Vermont prison system, Gov. Phil Scott said that “possibly building a new facility is on the table.” “I believe that we’re going to have to rethink what we’re going to do in the future,” Scott said. Scott said in considering the construction of a new facility, there are several ways to finance it. “I think we should consider a public-private partnership of some sort,” he said. Though Scott was not clear on the timing moving forward, he said a new facility “isn’t going to happen overnight,” and he believes the state can make the current system more efficient by closing the Windsor prison, which is part of his budget proposal. State officials and legislators say any potential plans for a new prison are in the very early stages. According to Human Services Secretary Al Gobeille, whose agency includes the Department of Corrections, “no options have been explored further than the facilities report.” There is no proposal on the table for a private prison corporation to build and operate a facility in Vermont, Gobeille said. A privately run facility is a “nonstarter as far as I’m concerned,” he said. Rep. Butch Shaw, R-Pittsford, vice chair of the House Corrections and Institutions Committee, said the panel has not yet explored the proposal. Even in this early phase, the idea is generating opposition. Steve Howard VSEA Executive Director Steve Howard. File photo by Elizabeth Hewitt/VTDigger Steve Howard, executive director of the Vermont State Employees’ Association, said the union members “vigorously oppose” the concept of a private company owning a prison in Vermont. “We believe there is no role for a private prison company in Vermont,” Howard said. “It’s not consistent with Vermont’s values.” The union has concerns that if a private prison company owned a facility, the company could jack up rental fees down the line, Howard said. The Vermont State Employees Association is also concerned that a private owner may eventually try to take over the functions of the facility. “We don’t want to start an addiction with another private prison company,” Howard said. He said private ownership of a prison is out of line with the “rehabilitative” focus of corrections. “A for-profit entity, when they see opportunity for more profit, are going to continue to ask for more profit,” Howard said. “Our mission is to get people out of the system and not to come back. Their incentive is to keep the beds filled.” Andrew MacLean, a lobbyist with MMR who represents CoreCivic, formerly the Corrections Corporation of America, said the company is aware Vermont has a potential need for new prison infrastructure in the state. Vermont once contracted with the Corrections Corporation of America to house inmates out of state. CoreCivic is familiar with the Vermont DOC facilities report and is interested in a public-private partnership, MacLean said, though he said the proposal is in such an early phase that the company has not yet made a request for information. The company has been involved in similar partnerships in California and Oklahoma, according to a spokesperson. However, MacLean said, CoreCivic is “absolutely not” interested in opening and running a private facility in the state. “They would definitely not operate a facility in Vermont even if asked,” MacLean said. Sen. Peg Flory, R-Rutland, who chairs the Senate Institutions Committee, said she would be interested in exploring the possibility of partnering with a private company on a new prison. The partnership model, Flory said, is “something we should definitely at least consider.” Flory said with other considerable infrastructure needs in the state, it is unrealistic for Vermont taxpayers to shoulder the full cost of building a new prison. Vermont is still finishing reconstruction after damage from Tropical Storm Irene in 2011, she said. A lab for the Agency of Natural Resources is slated to be built over the next two years. At this point, she said, there are “too many unanswered questions to definitely say this is the way to go.”
I sincerely hope this town won't be stupid enough to add more criminals to it twice in one lifetime. If you want to create jobs here build a Target, or a Costco; something people will benefit from.
ReplyDeleteAnother NEW PRISON in Vermont; just WHAT I NEED!
ReplyDeleteDecades ago, I used to worked at SESCF in Windsor; now believe SESCF will close. I emailed Gov Phil Scott, suggesting as Mt Ascutney has dormant volcano, therefore excellent produce with farmer, and help for more employees job: more fruit AND vegetables at the farmer market, coops, and grocery stores in Vermont, too. Not only that, but suggestion is Brattleboro VT makes produce cans at Ferry Street, too. I did not answer Gov Scott at all. Plus, Lieut. Gov David Zimmerman have a farmer, but all deaf ears in Montpelier VT!
Glad to not be a voter in Springfield, (I would have not voted for it anyway) and had voted on that Hell Hole in the Sand Pits. The government leaders that allowed it to come here in the first place can't be sleeping well at night, the ruined the town of Springfield allowing that facility to be here.
ReplyDeleteHere's how it works. No one will probably read this. It is to far down in this blog. Not many comments here on this topic. So guess what, sounds like you want or will accept an addition to the facility in Springfield. And that is how politics works. You snooze .....
ReplyDeletePeople in town voted TWICE to have the prison built here. Full disclosure: I worked in the campaign for the call for a second vote.
ReplyDeleteI think it passed because Wall Street had destroyed Precision Valley, causing our property taxes to rise 247% in 1983. A LOT of people were hurting, and we grabbed at the first illusory life ring that was tossed to us.
Now we have finally realized that simply getting some business into town that brings in $12+ million in wages and retail business income has some baggage with it that we have to deal with. We are in general unwilling (it's an inertia thing) to readjust our attitudes, norms and behaviors to improve our town's quality of life.
Until such time as we look at how to protect and enhance our economic base, we are going to continue to fall for the next proposed quick fix.
Any new prison facility built in the state should be constructed in Montpelier or Waterbury. Expanding corrections facilities in Springfield will utterly doom the town, cementing its reputation as the social sewer of southern Vermont. How can the town possibly attract new businesses, optimistic citizens and middle class tax payers if we hang another "dead skunk" around our neck?
DeleteWell ain't that a fine ideee, let's see if we can't find more clients fer those loverly folks at Springfield Sustainable Housing to assist. Why them folks have model women associated with dem who provide fine upstanding chillin fer our scools to scool. Why I was jus sayin the other day to the missus, how much it has halped the police department to hav something to do, and it has been just a wonderful boon to this here roomin house business that everyone is so excited about.
ReplyDeleteFace it; Springfield is Vermont's garbage can. The Montpelier/Burlington liberals get to say they're saving the world one loser at a time, (without having to actually live with them) while the conservative investor class rakes in the government cash (tax free, of course.) It really is a great scam!
ReplyDelete