www.dailyuv.com
www.eagletimes.com
Recent Springfield High senior faces potential life sentences Sexual assault investigations stretch back a year Wednesday, August 23, 2017 Eric Francis Vermont News Subscribe WHITE RIVER JUNCTION - A judge on Tuesday narrowly decided in favor of letting a Springfield teenager return to his parent’s home under a strict 24-hour-a-day curfew while he awaits trial on sexual assault charges that carry the potential for a sentence of up to life in prison. Advertisement: Content continues below... Want to see your ad here? Gregory Messer, 18, sat glumly in shackles at the defense table in the courtroom at the Windsor County Courthouse in downtown White River Junction as his defense attorney, Jordana Levine, entered innocent pleas on his behalf to five felony counts ranging from aggravated kidnapping in the commission of a sexual assault to committing repeated aggravated sexual assaults. Three of those charges carry mandatory minimum sentences of at least 10 years in prison, if Messer were to be convicted of them, and each of the five counts provides for a potential life term on the maximum side. While the term “kidnapping” brings to mind historical examples of elaborate abductions, under Vermont law someone can be considered kidnapped even if they are briefly forced from one room to another inside a residence for an illegal purpose, or if they are forcibly prevented from leaving somewhere they had already placed themselves once they are being subjected to something unlawful. The allegations against Messer cover a series of alleged incidents, the most serious of which involve a 15-year-old girl, that allegedly began one year ago, when Messer, then 17, was just about to begin his senior year at Springfield High School. Messer has since completed his senior year but did not graduate, a circumstance that Levine, his defense attorney, said in court she felt could be blamed on his having come down with mono earlier this year ,which she said looked like a stress reaction to the police investigation that began honing in on him this March. Springfield Police Detective Sergeant Patrick Call wrote in an affidavit that several students were initially investigated after staff at the high school got wind that nude and partially nude photos of several female students were being shown around on phones and that an unknown person using a male pseudonym was purportedly asking boys at the school who had these photos to contribute them to a collection on a Facebook page. That investigation, which is considered a “child pornography” case because many of the girls in question are underage, is still active and on-going, authorities said Tuesday but, while the individual with the apparently fictitious name who set up the Facebook page has yet to be identified or charged, Detective Call wrote that Greg Messer was the one person who kept coming up repeatedly in conversations with students as police worked to trace the origins of some of the photos. Call said that several people, not all of whom were students at the school, reported that Messer had showed them photos hidden in a “secret vault” on his phone that was disguised as an ordinary calculator app but which Call said was eventually determined to have 140 explicit photographs in it, including a handful of shots that the putative victim had taken of herself posing in her underwear. When investigators sat down with the girl and asked her how Messer had obtained the pictures, she said she had never sent them to anyone and she felt Messer had gotten hold of her phone, which did not have password, protection, when they were both at a mutual friend’s house and “airdropped” the pictures from her phone to his using a wireless connection. Call said that when Messer was interviewed in the principal’s office in mid-March by the police the teen cooperated and turned over all 140 photos, which he described as a mix of “some of pornographic images from the Internet and some of school age girls that Gregory knew,” Messer insisted the girl had consensually sent him the images of herself. Two days later, investigators conducted a “forensic interview” with the 15-year-old girl at the North Springfield Child Advocacy Center and that was when, Call wrote, she described what she said were three separate alleged sexual assaults that had taken place over the proceeding months. The girl told police that she and Messer were never in a dating relationship and that a friend of hers was actually Messer’s girlfriend at the time of one of the alleged assaults which she said occurred inside a house when Messer’s girlfriend was in another part of the residence with some other teens. In each instance, including two that took place inside Messer’s pickup truck after he had offered to give her a ride late in the evening, the girl said Messer began propositioning her to perform a sex act upon him and then, after she refused, allegedly ended up grabbing her and forcing her to do so, Detective Call wrote. Call said that other teenagers who were subsequently interviewed as witnesses backed up at least some details of the girl’s account of events. Detective Call interviewed Messer again in June, this time at the Springfield Police Department with Messer’s mother, who is a para-educator for Springfield’s school system, present alongside her son. Call wrote that during the course of interview Gregory Messer acknowledged that all three sexual encounters that the girl described had in fact occurred but Messer denied having used any force to get her to engage in them. “I asked Gregory if he had any thoughts about (why she would claim it was nonconsensual),” the detective wrote, “He stated ‘Not really’.” “I asked Gregory if he felt this type of sexual behavior is a problem for him,” Call continued, “He stated (it was) not a big problem but felt that it was something he could work on…Gregory advised he could put off these desires and was able to control them.” Messer’s arraignment on Tuesday came about after he was arrested Monday evening on a warrant that issued earlier in the day when he failed to show up for the original arraignment time for which he had been cited. Defense Attorney Levine told Judge Robert Gerety that while the Messer family was aware police were investigating their son, he had not yet told them he had in fact received a citation. Levine said the teen mis-read the date and thought his required court appearance was next week and said he’d still been “working up the courage” to explain his situation to his parents when police appeared at their door. On Tuesday afternoon, both of Messer’s parents and grandparents sat on a bench in the courtroom behind him, along with a family friend, before taking turns at the podium where they assured Judge Gerety that they would monitor the teen’s strict curfew conditions if he were to be released. Windsor County Deputy State’s Attorney Heidi Remick urged the judge to hold Messer without bail pending his trial but Levine successfully argued that the teen's life-long multi-generational ties to the community lessened his chances of being considered a flight risk. Judge Gerety agreed to release Messer under the terms of the curfew at the house where he has lived his entire life and after he signed for a $10,000 unsecured appearance bond. Vermont News can be contacted at vermontnews802@gmail.com
why is he not in jail,by not showing up to his first hearing,it shows he doesn't care.
ReplyDelete" Defense Attorney Levine told Judge Robert Gerety that while the Messer family was aware police were investigating their son, he had not yet told them that he had in fact received a citation. Levine said the teen mis-read the date and thought his required court appearance was next week and added that he’d still been “working up the courage” to explain his situation to his parents when police appeared at their door."
DeleteDid you READ the article?
i did read the article,he's 18 years old,he doesn't need his parent's and it's not their job to make sure that he shows up at court,i would think if i was facing life in prison,I'd make sure i understood everything fully,time to act like a adult
ReplyDeleteOMG stop it! He is a kid and the fact that he was in serious trouble is all the more reason he was working his courage up. Quit being so damn judgemental. If kids didn't need guidance s they would be born adults. The kid made a mistake. The female should be held accountable for her actions. First of all, if she was so innocent why did she even have pictures of herself nude on her phone? I can tell you why, because she was sending them off to boys. I can promise the female/s involved are not these innocent little princesses that everyone wants to make them out to be. They are some of springfields finest...you know the ones, they walk up and down the street pregnant at 16. Gimme a break already.Highest teen pregnancy rate in Vermont and we think these darlings are innocent? Where were these fine ladies parents (at 15 years of age) when their princesses were out perusing which male victim would be next? Yeah, exactly...parents were oblivious. This is an all too familiar story, young girls worried about parents and classmates finding out and next thing you know they play the innocent routine. Sorry I support the family and the Greg. He wouldn't hurt a flea. I love how quickly people jump to conclusions and turn their back and gossip and judge others. Open your eyes and take a look at your little town...take a look at the world. The dynamics of how young women interact socially is disgusting yet you are the first to point fingers and lay blame.
ReplyDeleteGeez mom
DeleteInteresting concept, curious to know where all these 16 year old pregnant girls are that roam the apparent area. Maybe 1 or 2 but nothing to the numbers you are judging (lay blame)
DeletePhotos and videos from his own cell phone, not to mention the prior investigation of texts sent to girls and guy friends... It's a wonder why the police would investigate this "young boy" who is 18 years of age. And if by chance one of the few girls could have been consensual is a bit far out in left field. "He wouldn't hurt a flea" yet in his smirk photo he appears to be a serial killer. As if portraying it to all be one big joke. I wonder how he'll do his first few weeks in jail? I wonder if the guards will come to his needs while he is getting pummeled in his butt hole? Much like those girls who cried, froze, and were defenseless to his threats and means of defiling the young woman's inner personal property, stress, anxiety, fear of their shadow the list goes on, and on. But rest assured when this dirt bag gets his sentencing he'll be under the supervision of the finest criminals looking at him like a piece of meat as he did to these young girls. #KARMA
which are ya family or friend,doesn't matter what kind of girls they are,they were underage period,that is against the law,i bet your tone would be a lot different if it was your daughter,so it's the towns fault that this happened,sound like it's every bodies fault but Greg,i hope he gets what he deserves and that is a long jail sentenance
ReplyDelete3:12 he is 18 years old,that makes him a adult,working up courage to tell his parent's,his parent's knew he was being investigated,he just doesn't want to take responsibility for what he did,you blaming it on the girl is pretty sad on your part,did she make him have sex with her,i bet not,hope he's put away for a long,if people like him are put in jail,maybe the teen pregnancy rate will drop in town
ReplyDelete3:12,by your logic,it's Jack Daniels fault i got a DWI
ReplyDeleteIt is common logic period. If the female was never taught morals then she is less than virtuous isn't she? My God you all are worse than a pack of hungry wolves. You assume without ANY knowledge that you know what happened and know the facts. It sounds like you are all a bunch of bitter old women who hate men. I will ask AGAIN for those who clearly were not bright enough to comprehend...WHY did this girl have pictures of herself nude? THAT alone says a lot. Because she was sending them off to men. Second, if he was so bad then why did this person continue to get in the car with him and be around him? Third, he was not 18 when this happened, they waited until he turned 18 to charge him, this happened over a year ago assuming ANYTHING happened. They burden of proof will be on what I will guess is a less than virtuous girl. Also, there seems to be more young men involved but that has yet to surfaced. Sorry, I just don't believe this boy is guilty of anything except getting involved with a wanton person from the wrong side of the tracks. If this were my case I would drag the females through the mud face first as very well might happen still, uncover her texts, her twitter and facebook and I think a lot will be understood about what kind of person and family she came from.
ReplyDelete90 percent of the men in town have pictures and video of women on their phone.
ReplyDeleteYou spelled boys wrong.
Deletethank you spellcheck
DeleteI was talking about anon 938. Saying that 90 percent of men do. They aren't men, they're boys
DeleteOK,he was 17 having sex with a 15 year old girl,still illegal,be it 3 times or 15 times still illegal,he took her phone and sent the pics to his and his friends phone,how is this the girl's fault,what about the kidnapping charge,is that the girls fault to,seems like everything is the victim's fault and nobodies else,your bashing the victim talking about what kind of person she and her family is,your something else
ReplyDeleteVermont has a close-in-age exemption, also known as a "Romeo and Juliet law", to the legal age of consent. This provision allows partners who are close in age, or both under the Vermont age of consent, to engage in consensual sex without fear of prosecution under Vermont age of consent regulations.
ReplyDeleteshe was under the age of consent,he was 17
ReplyDeleteSexting, gotta love it, smart phones are in most part going to be the down fall of society. They are dangerous. If a pen is mightier than the sword then a smart phone is mightier than a bomb.
ReplyDelete