Last used to execute two prison escapees who broke into an isolated home in Springfield brutally killing a retired lady school teacher residing there.
www.vnews.com www.vtdigger.org
The Story of Vermont's Last Two Executions
Francis Blair, white, age 32. Donald Demag, white, age 31. Murder. Their capital crime was committed on August 19, 1952 at Springfield, Vermont. These men attained national notoriety during their lifetimes. Demag in particular is remembered not only as a recidivist killer but as a major embarrassment to opponents of capital pumshment.
Their story begins on March 11, 1948, at Burlington, Vermont. It was then that Donald Demag committed his first murder. He was 26 years old, married with one child and another on the way. He was also unemployed and desperate for money. Not knowing where else to turn, he went to the shop of elderly harness maker, Francis Racicot (age 81), at No. 24 Center Street and asked the man for a loan. Racicot refused the request whereupon Demag battered him to death with an iron stove shaker. Then be took his wallet. Captured three days later, Demag was charged with capital murder. He subsequently drew a term of life imprisonment when he agreed to plead guilty to a reduced charge of second degree murder.
On August 27, 1950, this Donald Demag made a successful break from the Vermont State Prison. He managed to get the the Canadian border without incident. Days later, however, he was caught in an attempt to get back into the United States. Returned to prison, Demag began plotting his next move. On July 30,1952, he made that move. He teamed up with Francis Blair, a fellow convict from Fitchburg, Massachusetts, who was serving time for larceny, and staged a second successful break from the maximum security prison. The two men seized an unguarded moment to slip into the driver's compartment of a ten-ton work truck that was idling in the prison driveway. Then they crashed the vehicle through the massive front gates of the prison and escaped to freedom.
The manhunt which followed was unprecedented in Vermont history. Hundreds of law enforcement officers joined with heavily armed posses of citizens to scour the densely wooded countryside. So great was the alarm that one traveler reported passing through 12 roadblocks in a ten-mile stretch.
The fugitives spent two days and two nights in the deep woods. Then they made their way to the vicinity of Springfield and sought a source of food and clothing there. Late at night they broke into the house of a middle-aged couple named Donald and Elizabeth Weatherup (aged 56 and 54) and attacked the occupants with metal pipes. Both of the Weatherups were severely beaten. The woman died of her injuries.
When the details of this crime became known public anger ran so high that nearly every able-bodied man in the Springfield area joined in the hunt for the killers. Bloodhounds and airplanes were also pressed into service. Finally some of the posse made contact with Blair and Demag in the woods about three miles from the Weatherup house. They let loose with a massive shotgun barrage and threatened the fugitives with death unless they surrendered immediately. At that point Blair and Demag gave up.
Proponents of capital punishment seized upon this case to bolster their cause. They argued that life imprisonment was a proven failure for killers like Donald Demag. If he had been executed for his first murder, said they, his second murder would have been precluded. Death penalty opponents remained silent. This time there was no plea bargaining. Two separate juries also refused to recommend mercy. The penalty was death for both defendants. Both were returned to the Vermont State Prison in Windsor to await their fates. On February 8, 1954, Francis Blair was electrocuted pursuant to his sentence. Donald Demag met the same rate oa December 8.1954.
–From the book
Legal Executions in New England
By Daniel Allen Hearn
Case: State v. Blair
99 A.2d 677 (1953)
STATE v. BLAIR.
No. 1260.
Supreme Court of Vermont. Windsor.
October 6, 1953.
*679 F. Elliott Barber, Jr., Atty. Gen., Lewis E. Springer, Jr., State's Atty., White River Junction, for plaintiff.
Joseph M. O'Neill, Rutland, for defendant.
Before SHERBURNE, C. J., JEFFORDS, CLEARY and ADAMS, JJ., and HOLDEN, Superior Judge.
ADAMS, Justice.
This case is here on exceptions of the respondent following his trial by jury in the Windsor county court where he was convicted of murder in the first degree. The victim was Elizabeth Weatherup. She, with her husband, lived outside the village of Springfield, Vt. Their house was about 350 feet from the main highway leading from Springfield to Charleston, N. H. A neighbor, Raymond Lamire, lived between the Weatherup home and the main highway.
The respondent and one Donald Demag were prisoners in the state's prison at Windsor. On the morning of July 30, 1952, they escaped from the prison by forcibly driving and crashing a truck through steel gates at the sally port leading from the prison yard to the highway. An intensive search was made for them by local and state enforcement officers in the Windsor and Springfield area as the truck was found abandoned in that area.
Late in the evening of August 1 or early morning of August 2, two men entered the kitchen of the Weatherup house by breaking a glass in the door. At that time, Mr. and Mrs. Weatherup were in bed in a room on the ground floor. They were awakened by the noise and arose. After Mr. Weatherup entered the kitchen and when he had nearly reached another outside door, he received a terriffic blow on the back of the head. He "let out a yell", then grappled with the assailant, heard his wife scream, received another terriffic blow and slumped to the floor and was "blacked out" for a few minutes. When he regained consciousness, he reached up and unlocked the front kitchen door, arose and made his way down the steps and to the Lamire house as fast as he could. He aroused Mr. Lamire and told him as near as he could what had happened. The police were called and three of them came. Mr. Weatherup was bleeding very badly. It later developed that he had three wounds in his scalp, all of which required stitches, a cut between his fingers that required stitches, ten or twelve puncture wounds in his back and in back of one arm, a fractured rib and right wrist. He told the police very quickly what had happened and that his wife was still in the house. Read more...
Although Donald Demag was the last person executed by Vermont, he was not the last person to be sentenced to death by a Vermont court. In 1957, Lionel Goyet was sentenced to death, but his sentence was commuted six months later and Goyet was pardoned and released in 1969. The death penalty was abolished by Vermont in 1965.
Features Vermont Historical Society Stores Windsor State Prison’s Electric Chair Vermont Historical Society registrar Mary Rogstad stands with the state's electric chair in the basement of the Vermont Historical Society in Barre, Vt., Wednesday, August 2, 2017. The chair was built by the state in 1912 and was used in its fifth and last execution at the state prison in Windsor in December 1954. Three years after the death penalty was abolished in Vermont, the state donated the chair to the Vermont Historical Society. (Valley News - James M. Patterson) Copyright (c) Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com. "Two leather wrist straps with buckles," is part of the Vermont Historical Society's catalog description of the state's electric chair which has been in its collection since 1975. Barre, Vt., August 2, 2017. (Valley News - James M. Patterson) Copyright (c) Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com. The electric chair used by the State of Vermont to execute five prisoners at the state prison in Windsor now sits stored among other chairs and furniture in the collection of the Vermont Historical Society in Barre, Vt., August 2, 2017. The state donated the chair to the historical society in 1975. (Valley News - James M. Patterson) Copyright (c) Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com. The execution chamber at Windsor State Prison in Windsor, Vt. The photograph was taken by the official prison photographer in the early 1970s. (Courtesy Mike Coxon) Previous Next Previous Next By John Lippman Valley News Staff Writer Monday, August 07, 2017 Print WINDSORVT STATE PRISON WINDSOR ELECTRIC CHAIR VERMONT HISTORICAL SOCIETY BARRE In 1971 Howard Coffin was a political reporter with the Rutland Herald traveling with then-Gov. Deane Davis on his re-election campaign when they visited the Windsor State Prison. “I had never been in the prison before,” Coffin remembered last week during a break in the library of the Vermont Historical Society where the Civil War historian and author was researching material for a memoir. “We were walking around in a basement room, you could almost touch the ceiling it was so low,” Coffin recalled. He then saw Davis walk over and peer over a screen that was masking something behind it. Coffin watched as Davis’ expression changed. Coffin crossed the room to see what Davis was looking at. It was the state prison’s electric chair. The governor stood transfixed. “Davis was absolutely mesmerized,” Coffin said. Vermont abolished capital punishment in 1972 shortly after the U.S. Supreme Court called executions “cruel and unusual punishment” in the landmark case Furman v. Georgia. The state had last used the electric chair on Dec. 8, 1954, when it executed Donald Demag, 32, for his role in the slaying of retired school teacher Elizabeth Weatherup during an early morning break-in at her and her husband’s Springfield farmhouse. Demag and accomplice Francis Blair had escaped from Windsor State Prison three days earlier. The state executed a total of five men in its electric chair in Windsor between 1919 and 1954. This period in Vermont’s history is now largely forgotten and there has not been a major push to reintroduce the death penalty since lawmakers debated it in the early 1980s. But Vermont’s electric chair still exists — hidden away under a ghostly white sheet in a climate-controlled basement storage area filled with antique furniture at the Vermont Historical Society in Barre. It is seldom seen, and under the terms of the deal that transferred the electric chair from the state to the historical society, it can’t be put on public display. “It’s not something we like to talk a lot about,” said Mary Rogstad, the organization’s longtime registrar, who is responsible for cataloging and managing the database of the society’s collection. She said the electric chair is kept covered in order not to “upset” people who might encounter it when researching furniture and other items in the basement storage room. Executions as Public Spectacles Demag and Blair were the fifth and fourth men to be sentenced to death in Vermont’s electric chair. A total of 26 people have been executed in the state’s history: 21 by hanging — including two women — and five in the electric chair. During the 19th century, executions of convicted criminals were frequently a public spectacle in Vermont, and elsewhere in the country. As barbaric as the electric chair is considered today, it was originally invented and promoted as a more humane method of taking life. Vermont’s execution of Archibald Bates is a case in point. When Bates, the fifth person to be executed in the state, was hanged for the murder of his sister-in-law at Bennington Center in 1839, thousands of people showed up. Some brought picnic baskets on the unseasonably warm February day. But, it turned into a horror show that people were still recalling decades later. The Bennington Banner, relying upon an eyewitness account, said the hanging of the 210-pound Bates “nearly pulled his bones apart.” The gruesome spectacle moved the Vermont Legislature to pass a law banning “public” executions so that henceforth they were to be carried out at the state penitentiary in Windsor, built in 1808 and what was to become one of the country’s oldest prisons in continuous use before it closed in 1975. By the late 1800s, however, politicians, reacting to a series of gruesome hangings, became focused upon the electric chair as an expeditious and supposedly merciful form of ending human life. The first execution by electric chair was conducted by New York State in 1890. By 1896, Ohio became the second state to adopt the electric chair, followed by Massachusetts (1898), New Jersey (1906), Virginia (1908) and North Carolina (1912). Then in 1913 seven states signed on, including Vermont, according to The Death Penalty: An American History, a 2002 book by legal historian Stuart Banner. The manufacturer of Vermont’s electric chair is unknown, but the news wire UPI reported in 1975 — when the state’s electric chair was in the process of being transferred from Windsor to the Vermont Historical Society — that the state Legislature in 1912 approved “a special $3,000 appropriation to build the death house at the state prison in Windsor. “Corrections Department records show the state spent $368.33 for labor, $825.67 for construction and materials and $1,789 for ‘furniture and fixtures’, ” UPI reported. The last person to be executed by hanging in Vermont was Arthur Bosworth on Jan. 2, 1914, for the murder of Mae LaBelle in Essex Junction, six months earlier. In an account of the execution in the Burlington Free Press, the newspaper noted that “the execution was the last hanging to take place in Vermont, as hereafter all murderers condemned to death are to be electrocuted.” Electric Chair Era Begins The first condemned prisoner to be executed in Vermont’s electric chair was George Warner on July 12, 1919, for the November 1914 murder of his wife’s parents in Andover, Vt. Warner received the announcement of the verdict after the jury deliberated for three hours at the courthouse in Woodstock in July 1915, with “the stoic indifference which has characterized his behavior all through his trial,” the Bennington Banner reported. In 1932, almost exactly 13 years later, on July 7, Vermont used the electric chair for the second time to put to death Bert Stacy, a Barre granite polisher, for the murder of his estranged wife, Ruth Stacy, in the barn of a Berlin farm in April 1931. Stacy maintained his innocence of the murder until the end and was described by an Associated Press reporter as “entirely composed as he was led to the chair.” The third man to die in the electric chair was 21-year-old Canadian farmhand Ronald Watson, on Jan. 2, 1947, for the 1946 Christmas Eve slaying of Rutland taxicab driver Henry Teelon. Notified only eight hours beforehand of the time of his execution that evening, the Burlington Free Press reported Watson said he “met death calmly” after being asked by a Catholic priest “You are sorry for your sins, Ronald?” “Yes, Father, I am. Will you bless me, Father,” Watson replied. Francis Blair, 32 at the time he was executed and the fourth man to die in the chair, spent his final hours in the company of a Catholic priest “playing several games of checkers during the evening,” according to a news story by Neal Houston, a reporter with the Burlington Free Press who later became chief of staff for Vermont Gov. Robert Stafford. “Sixteen witnesses were in the tiny, dingy death chamber when the executioner threw the switch at 10:10 p.m. A steady flow of electricity shot through Blair’s body for 2½ minutes and he was pronounced dead at 10:13 p.m.,” Houston reported. The condemned man’s final meal consisted of “pork chops, French fried potatoes, vanilla ice cream and coffee. He wore a white shirt and dungarees. His hair was not completely shaved. Only one spot was shaved and the leg of his left trouser was slit to allow the executioner to attach the electrode,” the story said. Donald Demag’s execution 11 months later, on Dec. 8, 1954, was described by a Burlington Free Press eyewitness account reporting that Warden John Ferguson took “extra precautions” by assigning 10 prison guards at the scene. Ferguson said that Demag had been given a “mild sedative” both the night before and the morning of his execution because he had “difficulty sleeping.” He walked “unaided” to the chair, praying silently with William Ready, the Catholic chaplain of the prison,” the newspaper said. “Five guards quickly strapped Demag into the chair as the other five stood grouped around as if in a show of strength to prevent any last-minute attempt by Demag to make his third break from the prison.” Like Blair, the back of Demag’s head was shaved and a slit was cut in his left trouser leg for the electrode. His face was “completely covered by a mask.” Ready stood 10 feet away reciting Hail Marys “until the first and only shock of 2,000 volts was sent through Demag’s body. No sound was heard in the crowded, tiny death chamber for almost two minutes,” the newspaper reported. Demag’s lifeless body was examined by Dr. William Krause, of Windsor, who “turned to Ferguson and nodded his head.” Ferguson then “broke the eerie silence” and said “pronounced dead by Dr. Krause at 8:53 p.m.” Stress on Witnesses Houston, the Burlington Free Press reporter who covered both Blair’s and Demag’s executions, recounted in an interview 28 years later that “it was simply impossible for me not to be affected emotionally. “My most vivid impression was of Demag because his body reacted very violently to the execution. There was extreme twitching ... it all happened in a relatively short time but it seemed like a eternity,” he told reporter John Donnelly in a 1982 story in the Burlington Free Press. Houston, who died in 2014, said that after witnessing Blair’s execution he asked to be exempted from covering Demag’s but his editors refused the request. Coffin, the Civil War historian and author, said that Rutland Herald managing editor Kendall Wild related to him the horror of covering both Blair’s and Demag’s executions when Coffin was a reporter for the newspaper in the 1960s. “After Wild saw the first execution he went to file the story at the Herald office in Springfield,” Coffin said. “Then afterward he went to the Springfield police station with a fifth of liquor and asked the police to lock him up in the cell for the night,” where he could drink in solitude and safety. “He killed a fifth, he was so upset.” Coffin said about Wild. “He said there seemed to be no purpose to it.” There was even a point at which Vermont’s electric chair could have been utilized for additional executions. In 1942, Vermont officials seemed willing to loan the state’s electric chair to South Dakota, whose governor had requested to borrow it for a scheduled execution. South Dakota’s prison system had been barred by the War Production Board from building its own because construction would have involved the use of “critical materials” required for the war effort, according to the Associated Press. But the Sioux Falls, S.D., Argus-Leader reported the arrangement was eventually abandoned due to technical and logistical problems. Mike Coxon, the retired superintendent of the Southeast State Correction Facility who had previously overseen vocational education and training programs at the prison — and where his father had worked before him for 22 years — said the execution chamber was located on the ground floor adjacent to cell block B and the solitary confinement cells. Vermont had no state executioner, Coxon said. Instead, the state had to hire an “electrician” from out of state who understood how to operate the equipment properly. When the chair was built, he said, it was purposefully designed with “overstrapping” to accommodate Ronald Watson’s body, “who was the most muscular, thick man” the jailers had ever met. “His arms were bigger than most men’s thighs,” Coxon said. After Demag’s execution, the electric chair remained stationed in the execution room for the next 26 years. The public could glimpse the chair during tours of the prison, Coxon said. And according to longtime Windsor resident Barbara Rhoad, shortly before Windsor Prison was closed, “they let all the school kids through Windsor prison and they let the kids sit in” the electric chair. Resting Place In 1975, after the Windsor State Prison was shut down and renovated into housing units and capital punishment had been abolished in the state, prison officials donated the state’s electric chair to the Vermont Historical Society. State Sen. Wesley Grady, of Underhill, called Weston Cate, then the VHS director, in 1975 after the lawmaker learned that the electric chair was being transferred. Cate’s reply suggests Grady was concerned that the electric chair would be put in the society’s museum for public viewing. “I can assure you that the Vermont Historical Society has no intention whatsoever of placing the chair on public display in our museum. We intend to place it in our storage quarters,” Cate assured. He explained that after prison authorities approached the society about accepting the chair “our museum people agonized for three weeks over whether to accept custody of the chair.” But, ultimately, the decision to accept it was based upon the electric chair’s status as “a genuine historical artifact that played a part in Vermont history.” Another reason to accept custody of the chair, Cate said, was to prevent it from falling into the hands of “private parties” and “souvenir hunters, and the like, who are anxious to get their hands on the chair.” “We issued no publicity of any kind about the decision,” Cate assured Grady. As for stories that had appeared in the newspaper about the society taking possession of the electric chair, they “had to come either from the prison or Department of Corrections ... we would have much preferred no publicity whatsoever,” Cate wrote. Cataloged as number 75.92 — the first two digits signify the year of donation, the second two mean it was the 92nd item to be accepted that year — society records say the electric chair was received in October 1975. “Massive oak chair 53” high, 26” x 28”, plywood seat,” reads the society’s catalog record. “Has two sets of heavy leather straps behind the seat part, and ankle straps attached to the footrest. The electric connections are removed … adjustable back and leg rests. Back is hinged to go back, held in position with two nuts (missing). “Brass reinforcing plates on arm rests and back. Plywood seat is a replacement. Two leather leg straps with buckles. Two leather wrist straps with buckles. Two leather arm straps with buckles, one leather waist strap with buckle and one leather torso strap with buckle. “A plate, probably the manufacturer’s identification plate is missing from the front of the seat.” Occasionally the museum fields inquiries about the electric chair. Rogstad said a few years ago she showed the chair to a descendent of one of the men executed in it who had requested to see it. She declined to identify the descendant to protect the person’s privacy. The body of Demag, the last person executed in Vermont, was buried in a family plot in Essex Junction, three days after his death. A newspaper account reports the burial ceremony was attended by Demag’s parents and his divorced wife. The body of Francis Blair was buried at the Vermont State Prison Inmate Cemetery in Windsor. All the plots are marked by a cross. At the cross of Francis Blair someone planted a flowering vine. John Lippman can be reached at jlippman@vnews.com.
My family lived next door to the Weatherups. After Mrs. Weatherup was murdered, her husband ran to my parents home to call the police. The house, by the way, was not an "isolated farmhouse." It was a beautiful home, just off Route 5 at the bridge leading to the Paddock Road in the Goulds Mills section of town.
ReplyDeleteIt should be on display in the Springfield Prisons lobby or where ever new "inmates" are lead so they can see it. They will have something to think about.
ReplyDeleteI am glad they didn't throw the chair away. Now they can hook it back up and put it to good use again. The quality of life went south in Vermont not long after they suspended the usage of the chair. Time to bring it back and use it again.
ReplyDeleteOf course, executing them did serve as an effective deterrent, because since then there have been no homicides in Vermont! Which also explains why we never had to use the chair again...
ReplyDeleteThe rate of recidivism is zero for those executed in the electric chair, so you are accurate Chuck. Once they've sat in the chair, we never have to use it on them again!
DeleteFor those readers not old enough to recall the history of arguments for the death penalty, a chief one was that it served as a deterrent to would-be killers.
DeleteGary Gilmore exposed the fraudulence of the death penalty when he insisted he be executed. He realized spending a lifetime in prison was worse than dying. How much do you REALLY want to punish a killer?
Did anyone notice the execution took place 18 months after the crime? 18 months? Wow. How times have changed for the worse - now it would be 18 years. Oh, and Mr. Gregory, if he had been put to death after the first murder, there would not have been the second. For once, I'm willing to donate just one more cup of coffee to pay for the electricity to make old sparky come to life again!!!
ReplyDelete