The Woolson Block building renovation has come with hurdles, including revenue shortfalls and added construction costs, but despite challenges developers say they expect construction to begin this fall and finish in about a year.
www.vermontjournal.com
Construction on Woolson Block expected to start in the fall BY PATRICK ADRIAN, The Shopper May 1, 2018 SPRINGFIELD, Vt. – The Woolson Block building renovation has come with hurdles, including revenue shortfalls and added construction costs, but despite challenges developers say they expect construction to begin this fall and finish in about a year. “This is a pretty difficult project,” Springfield Housing Authority Executive Director Bob Morelock told the Springfield Select Board on Monday, April 23. “It started off at about $5 million [in estimated cost]. We’re up to about $8.1 million.” Morelock’s update came during the board’s discussion of a loan amendment request by the new Woolson building owners, the Woolson Block Limited Partnership, which would give more flexibility to the owners during repayment. Woolson Block The Select Board voted to amend loan repayment for the construction on the Woolson Block project. Photo provided. The town loaned $200,000 to developers to transform the Woolson Block building into an affordable housing and commercial complex, with original plans for 15 affordable apartments, four transitional housing units for homeless youth, and commercial spaces at the street level. Project partners include the Springfield Housing Authority, Springfield Regional Development Corporation, Springfield on the Move, and several social services organizations. The amendment, which the Select Board unanimously approved, changes the original loan terms from repayment over 20 years with a one percent interest rate to 25 years with zero interest. More importantly, the amendment allows the owners to repay from its surplus cash, rather than in fixed installments. To illustrate the difference, under a traditional loan the owners would typically repay a fixed amount of $8,000 each year, for 25 years, for a total of $200,000. Under the surplus cash provision, should the owners not have $8,000 in funds from its cash surplus, the owners may pay a lesser amount that year without penalization. The owners still have to pay the remaining loan, Morelock explained in a phone interview. This provision just gives them more flexibility with its repayment schedule. Based on projected revenue data for Woolson Block, Morelock said he believes the owners will generate sufficient surplus cash to cover its annual payments. The intent is only to give the owners as much flexibility and support as possible. “This is a complicated project,” Morelock told the Select Board. “We’ve been lucky to get partners in this particular project. If it wasn’t for [them] we wouldn’t be doing this project. Nobody would be doing this project.” Needed architectural revisions have resulted in $200,000 additional spending for youth housing accommodations, and having to take down the northwest and southwest corners of the building, where additions were constructed on faulty foundations. Though removing these corners opens outdoor space for a potential riverside walkway, it also results in one less apartment unit. The project also has received less grant funds than solicited. Developers requested $750,000 from the state’s Community Development Block Grant program but only received $400,000, and a grant request for $500,000 from the Federal Home Loan Bank was denied completely. Morelock told the board, however, that he expects most of that $850,000 shortfall to be made up in another grants. Also, most of the project’s costs are funded through housing and downtown tax credits, which the developers have attained. Developers plan to begin the contract bidding and have construction underway by September or October.
I'm glad they are getting the Vermont Machine Tool deal. No penalty when the loan is never paid back.
ReplyDeleteAmen! It's criminal how the idiots responsible for economic growth foolishly squander capital. Vermont Machine Tool and Trout River being notable examples. Neither had any potential or collateral for payback. Here's a hint. If an enterprise is viable, private equity money and bank loans will follow. If investors and banks wont touch it, then for the love of God why does our Selectboard think it's great idea? The real kick being, there are some very lucrative, technology based, local business that could add meaningful jobs with an influx of funds. Want to know why that doesn't happen? Hint, Someone is not getting their palm greased. Think not? Ask to see a line item budget of salaries and administrative expenses for SRDC grant disbursement.
DeleteVMT was once a profit-making company that declined and eventually failed. Trout River Brewing is a start-up that's still going; whether and when they repay loans is still undetermined, and for all I know they are making payments. Have you 7:56 heard otherwise? Regardless, it's not quite accurate to equate those two companies.
DeleteWell said commenter at 7:56 am
ReplyDeleteI am not there to see, so my question is has anything been done with this building is the recent past with the money that was there?
ReplyDeleteMore low-income housing downtown is NOT what Springfield needs. Cramming the poor into every crack and crevice may suit some people's ideology, but it will do NOTHING to revitalize this town. Ask yourself these questions; do middle-income people move INTO ghettos, or do they move OUT of them? Do businesses thrive there, or do they die there? If you want Springfield to become a ghetto, keep building low-income housing! I sincerely hope that when this project fails to improve downtown, the Selectboard will repurpose the Woolson Block into something that will attract businesses and middle-income residents! After years of wallowing in poverty, this town is FINALLY starting to turn around; DON'T SCREW IT UP NOW!
ReplyDeleteThe town has not been able to get ride of the hangouts downtown, summer is coming they will be all over soon. So why not give them a more comfortable place to live on the tax payers dime.
ReplyDelete