www.rutlandherald.com
Projected Springfield school tax break shrinks almost in half By Susan Smallheer STAFF WRITER | April 06,2016 Email Article Print Article SPRINGFIELD — Residents who were anticipating a 6-cent decrease in the school portion of their property tax bill will likely have to settle for about half that amount. Superintendent Zachary McLaughlin announced Monday night that recent changes in education funding by the Vermont Legislature had cut the projected reduction to 3 ½ cents. “It’s the first tax cut in a decade,” McLaughlin told members of the Springfield School Board. “But it’s not as large as expected. I want to be very transparent with our public.” McLaughlin said the adjustments to the state education funding formula, and the recent spending caps imposed by the Legislature in 2015, had reduced the Springfield tax break. Springfield, responding to Act 46, had cut spending. Voters had been told this winter the Springfield school budget would result in a six-cent decrease, after the School Board had made significant cuts to avoid any increase and associated financial penalties for too large an increase. The board agreed with a plan by McLaughlin to shut down The Gateway School, a program within the school district for troubled students. The students will be absorbed into the regular school system, but in the process 14 jobs were eliminated. “We would be shocked if there’s any additional decrease,” said McLaughlin after the meeting. He said the Vermont House had adjusted the “yield” portion of the school funding formula in response to complaints from other school districts who were about to hit the spending cap established by the Legislature. “The Legislature felt political pressure,” he said, adding that there was confusion among state agencies on state funding formulas, which added to the problem. In other business, school finance director Steve Hier outlined the district’s agreement with Vermont Telephone Co., or Vtel, to replace two old telephone systems at Park Street School. Hier said the school building was served by two different systems, one for the administrative offices, which dated to 1990, and the system that served the rest of the building, which had been installed in the building in 2000 after being removed from Springfield High School. He said the new system, a VoIP, or voice over Internet protocols, would be portable if the school district ever stops using Park Street School. He said the “brain” of the system would be rented from Vtel, in addition to all the software. Hier said the change would actually save the district money, since it was costing $6,300 a year to operate and maintain the two systems; the new single system will cost $5,400 a year.
It is really sad that we would brag about saving 6% by laying off 34 school staff. What dynamic drives us to believe that the way to improve Springfield education is to produce near-ignoramuses?
ReplyDeleteIt doesn't have to be like this. One of the best-- if not the very best-- educational systems in the world is in Norway, which used to have a system no better than ours.
In a movie that's playing in town right now-- "Where to Invade Next," a visit to that country shows that their high school students are bi- and tri-lingual, the system rejects the idea of teaching to standardized exams, and the children spend only 3 to 4 hours a day in school-- yet they are probably the best-educated children in the world. Their minister of education reveals their dirty little secret (which I leave for you to find out).
For only $2,000 more than we spend on our special ed population, there is a school system in Chicago which produces graduates who will readily be accepted by any US university. Why don't we turn our school district into a magnet for families who want a good education? Why do we have this pinched and niggqardly attitude toward what is supposed to be a fundamental investment in the future of our families and our town?
It's called Unions. They are ruining education.
DeleteChuck, we can now brag about laying off 34 and getting a three percent savings.
DeleteHey Chuck,, attend a School Board meeting would ya..
DeleteA country that turned out people that don't know the difference between cents and percent has no chance of educating the children. It's evident the adults aren't educated in this country considering the supposed cream of the crop is running everything and the economy, schools and society is a total mess. The delusional people in charge believe they went to good schools back in the good old days before the unions had much power.
ReplyDeleteMy WW2 Generation parents went to bad schools, baby boomers went to bad schools. The schools where designed 100 years ago by the robber barons to keep the working class down. It worked real well considering how many people actually believe their child goes to a good school and how many people believe in a worthless school system that is screwing them.
Suckers believe they are educated if they mastered trivia about grammar and spelling that was made up by the robber barons to pretend it was education.
Look Biff & Muffy got A's in English class so think they are educated but don't know the difference between cents and percent.
Cents and percent are the same thing, Einstien.
DeleteUmmm, you misspelled Einstein. That kinda detracts from that little barb of yours. Oh well, just proving Forrest Gump correct I suppose.
DeleteHouse forsale
ReplyDelete25 cents off
25 percent off
it's the same thing ?
The schools might as well be closed down.
Chuck, please put all your money where your mouth is and donate it all to the school system so happiness can reign supreme by using it to hire as many people as possible - whether they're needed or not. Before you deplore how sad it is that others desire to curb wasteful spending, please take the lead in irresponsible behavior and waste your money first!
ReplyDeleteWe know you won't, because you're a good socialist who advocates the spending of other's money before their own.
12:59: Warren Buffet (I trust you know who he is) has challenged all of America's other billionaires to donate half of their wealth (as he has) to charitable purposes. Guess how many of the 4,000 have taken him up? Last number I heard was FOUR.
DeleteClearly, there is a systemic problem affecting how we value education. I could put about half my annual income toward the school system without affecting my lifestyle, but it wouldn't change the system. We need to change the system. If you understood the inequity of the tax system, you'd change your mind about funding schools.
I would recommend you take up the offer of the late Rod Toulinen, formerly Riverside principal, and teach their for a day. It will open your eyes.