VFCHP will provide services that are family-driven with care coordination that incorporates evidence-based mental health services, and will support coordination and service delivery improvements between Vermont’s Community Mental Health Centers and the Federally Qualified Health Center in two regions of the state.
The grant funding will be used to implement the project for children and families in Windham and Windsor Counties at Health Care and Rehabilitative Services (HCRS) and Springfield Medical Care Systems (SMCS), and in Franklin and Grand Isle Counties at Northwest Counseling and Support Services and Northern Tier Center for Health (NOTCH). The Department expects to expand grant activities to other regions following the second year, using best practices and lessons learned from these two regions.
“Research tells us comprehensive health care can help children and their families head off a range of problems later in life, avoiding the pain and suffering of unaddressed mental and emotional issues, as well as decreasing health care-related spending of all kinds,” said VDHM Commissioner Melissa Bailey. “The Department is very excited for this opportunity to work with the community mental health providers and the FQHCs to improve care and treatment for children and their families. We look forward to developing a model to improve the outcomes for children.”
The VFCHP aims to provide a safe, accessible and family-centered health care resource for children, youth and families to receive comprehensive, integrated pediatric and mental health care services and develop a model that invites and engages the family into the process of owning and directing their own health care through increased knowledge.
The project will provide improved clarity around options, the risks and benefits, and support to the family in making their own decisions about care and treatment. Additionally, it provides a process for providers to have regular care plan meetings to allow for shared decision making, shared care plans to improve health outcomes and address social determinants of health.
In a joint statement, Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Peter Welch (D-Vt.) said: “It is critical that we do a better job at addressing mental health needs in this country. One of the best ways to do that is through prevention and early intervention that is integrated with physical health care. This federal grant will allow our state to develop a stronger system to help families access critical services and be more active in their own health. We all want Vermont children to have a healthy family and strong future. This grant will help in that effort.”
“This grant is incredibly valuable for Vermont in supporting our children with a comprehensive approach to health care, and I want to thank our congressional delegation and federal partners for supporting this initiative,” said Gov. Scott. “As my Administration focuses on a health care system that prioritizes prevention, this is the type of innovative project that can help us in those efforts, and in our work to better address mental health as a state and as a nation.”
Vermont gets $9.9 million federal grant for substance abuse and mental health services
Most of it destined for a few pockets in Springfield.
ReplyDelete8:08 you have that right. As a family member of a mentally ill individual, I can honestly say that VT's Mental Health is a complete joke. They drug them and consider it a done deal. No efforts in actually trying to help the individual prosper or become more mentally fit for society.
DeleteAs is the rest of America. I wonder how many people know that the "medications" given to the mentally ill only turn them into compliant, easily manipulated zombies, who will eventually die FROM the drugs! All so that the rest of us can feel we've done our best to "help" them. It's worse than you think.
DeleteThe American cultural value seems to be, "There's a pill for that."
ReplyDeleteIn Vermont, something like 30% of schoolchildren are on ADD medication. In France, the rate is 0.04%.
The difference is that in France, the medical system allows a more nuanced approach. The French health care system pays for a look at all the factors that are at play in ADD. This means the doctor, the mental health counselor, the family therapist, the teacher, the school counselor and other professionals take a look at what's going on and collaborate to come up with a non-pharmaceutical resolution. The result is that Ritalin is not the first line of response.
So the question we in Springfield ought to ask ourselves is, "How do French schoolchildren compare educationally with American schoolchildren?" "How does the French opioid use rate compare with the American rate?" and, "What should we be doing differently in Springfield?"
Schools get extra $$$ for "Special Needs" students. We are labeling our kids for life and drugging them to death. Teaching methods need to change. We are still using the same technique as we did in the 1800s. Thank the Unions.
ReplyDeleteTeaching methods do NOT need to change! What worked for Helen Keller's case in 1890 is still valid today. It's just that we try to educate children on the cheap with a one-size-fits-all approach.
ReplyDeleteThanks to the resiliency of kids, this works fairly well, but it doesn't bring out most of their potential. If we provided every child with her or his own Annie Sullivan (someone who knew what lay untapped inside the student), we would have the best educational system in the world. Of course, we'd be pauperizing ourselves-- but you get the idea.
As one of Springfield's very best teachers, Larry Carbonetti, put it, "A teacher brings out in a child that which he didn't know was there." Teaching techniques used at present can do that. All we need is a system which encourages teachers to encourage their students' latent potential. This means fine- or re-tuning what we already have in place.