Friday, December 28, 2018

Vermont Boy Scout chapter adds 95 girls to Cub program

As the Boy Scouts of America faces mounting legal battles, the organization has opened multiple scout programs to females and, since June, 95 girls have joined the Cub Scout program in Vermont.


www.vtdigger.org



34 comments :

  1. Inclusivity, a very misguided use of the word.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous Roger: You are obviously a religious, redneck, right winger, nut job, with zero substance. Your tolerance of other beliefs is disgusting.

    BTW - I am pretty sure I make and have more money than you and Patriotically pay more taxes than you. Enjoy your "ham sandwich".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey, what are you doing up at 2:16 AM you bloviating blowhard? Just another sodden drunken fool. How's it feel to be a LOSER in the game of life.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Does seem like a loser and probably drunk post, why would you be concerned to post at 2:16 in the morning. Thin Skin and no life probably cause that post, Sad!

      Obviously can't read either, Anonymous? Its says Roger, I think I'll have a ham sandwich today.

      Delete
  4. Classic transferrence....

    ReplyDelete
  5. Classic ALKY....Your early grave awaits!!!

    Do everybody a favor and jump into an abandoned well so we don't shoulder the cost of burying your shriveled liver miserable body.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't believe that traditional organizations and institutions should be changed, just for change's sake. Some things are worthy of preserving, even if they don't necessarily suit the agenda of others. That applies to a lot of things, nowdays. It's a free country; no one is forced to join the Scouts, go to church, or get married. Altering these institutions to the point where they become meaningless does no one any favors; we end up being a nation without definitions. Relativism is a slippery slope that has no bottom, and we are already a long way down. Trump did not become President by accident; he is what happens when moral, ethical, and cultural standards are lost.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey snowflake liberal 7:52, it's nitwits like you that pushes for these 'everybody get a trophy' type of changes in our society. So in the end, anything you believe lacks validity.

    ReplyDelete
  8. 9:02, you're so blitheringly stupid that you can't recognize a conservative perspective when you see one. You have no real philosophical or ideological foundation, other than what serves your own pathetic, greedy interests. You are nothing more than a sick animal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "Conservative" my azz! Just another never-Trumper hiding inside his antifa hoodie. Go suck your thumb Bozo!

      Delete
    2. I never claimed to be a conservative, only that my perspective on this issue is. It's "small c" conservative, anyway. You have abandoned any moral authority you may have once had in your mad lust for power and money. You're not a Conservative, your an Objectivist. Never Trump? Never again, anyway!

      Delete
  9. As a result of some of the above posts, one spouse and three children were spared the prospect of domestic abuse when their abusers were able to vent in writing....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I tried to start an intelligent, thoughtful conversation at 7:52. I didn't get too far, though. My 9:45 response may have been a bit harsh, but I do believe it was accurate, and indeed warranted.

      Delete
  10. 9:02 - Why do rednecks like to call people "snowflake"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They think it's funny. Of course, they also think fart jokes are funny, so.....

      Delete
    2. Certainly he/she is not calling liberals '"snowflakes" because there's 'no two alike'. On the contrary, liberals find safety in MOB behavior attacking individuals in their homes and at resteraunts. Spineless ANTIFA lovers!

      Delete
    3. Like at the Waffle House?

      Delete
  11. It's all rather a moot point. Boy Scouts of American has filed for bankruptcy due to lawsuit onslaught of vengeful gays. Coupled with dwindling membership as responsible parents wisely avoid subjecting their child to an institution that's become a haven for gay pedophiles. No different than our once majestic,family churches along Main Street. Once liberals selfishly corrupted these 200 year old beacons of morality their fate was sealed.

    There will be a backlash to the gay destruction of Boy Scouting. Alternative, self-funded, private groups are gaining popularity. These groups, some of paramilitary, fundamentalist persuasion will carry a bitter memory of who their enemy is.

    https://www.marketwatch.com/story/boy-scouts-of-america-looks-to-bankruptcy-as-membership-falls-lawsuits-mount-2018-12-12

    https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t973261/

    https://wehavekids.com/youth-programs/Conservative-Boy-Scout-Alternatives

    ReplyDelete
  12. Conservative Boy Scout alternatives? Let me guess; the Hitler Youth, right? Get off my bandwagon, Nazi. There's no room for you here.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Can boys join the girl scouts?

    ReplyDelete
  14. chuck gregory12/30/18, 4:38 PM

    Let's stop the homophobia right here: Child molesters do not do so because of sexual orientation.
    This is a meme promoted by America's Christian equivalent of the Taliban.

    There are two types known. The Southern Poverty Law Center reports: “The fixated child molester — the stereotypical pedophile — cannot be considered homosexual or heterosexual because "he often finds adults of either sex repulsive" and often molests children of both sexes. Regressive child molesters are generally attracted to other adults, but may "regress" to focusing on children when confronted with stressful situations.”

    You'll find even more interesting insights here:

    https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2011/10-anti-gay-myths-debunked

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can count on Chuck to rally in defense of his butt buddies. Butt thousands of incidents are undeniable proof, pubescent Boy Scouts are an irresistible allure to homosexual pedophiles. As detailed in the link, scouting has fought for years to keep this element at bay. Now, it's open season on young boys with every honest father branded as suspect. We can't have a civil war soon enough. HOORAH TROOP 216 of old!
      https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-xpm-2012-10-18-sns-rt-us-usa-boyscouts-abusebre89h0zf-20121018-story.html

      Delete
  15. Southern Poverty Law Center....lol....one of the MOST racist and bigoted organizations in the USA!

    ReplyDelete
  16. As a kid, I had no idea that the boy scouts had a political or religious agenda. As an adult, I find it sad that the boy scouts have a political and religious agenda. Perhaps they would not have this problem if they acted like a public service to help youth with life skills and without setting political or religious conditions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was in the Scouts when I was a kid. I never knew it had a political or religious agenda, either. It was all pretty mainstream. Probably still is. It's our culture that's gotten radical. Nobody is forcing anyone to join the Scouts; if you don't like their "politics or religion," don't join them. Forcing them to change to suit someone else's cultural agenda is ridiculous, and deprives them of their ability to be themselves. This country was founded on religious and political freedom; as long as they are not directly infringing on the rights of others, they have a RIGHT to exist just as they are. The problem these days is that both the Left and Right in this country seem intent on forcing their respective agendas down the rest of our throats. Every institution and tradition is under assault, or has already been co-opted or corrupted. That's why independents are the largest group of registered voters; we know who's causing the problems. The partisans point fingers at each other, but they're both to blame.

      Delete
  17. chuck gregory12/30/18, 6:32 PM

    ...and what's your source for that claim, 5:13 PM?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Read it and weep Chuck.

      http://thefederalist.com/2018/05/07/5-reasons-southrtn-poverty-law-center-hate-mongering-scam/

      Delete
    2. Correction: Misspelled 'southern' in link

      Delete
    3. Interesting article 7:35. Just goes to show, give your organization a feel-good name and all the idiot libs will open their wallets..... after doing ZERO research!

      Chuck is awfully quiet. I wonder how much he donated! LOL

      Delete
    4. chuck gregory12/31/18, 4:35 PM

      Ah, yes! The publication of the society the greedy join when they get rich. The society which has four members on the Supreme Court. One of their ilk, a UofC Law School prof name Todd Henderson, complained at length about the proposed Obama tax hike making it impossible for him and his wife to live on $400,000 a year. Economist Brad DeLong, whom Henderson insulted, eviscerated him by pointing out why he wouldn't have any money left at the end of the month (the gardener, the dance lessons, the French tutor, the $1,000,000 Hyde Park Home, the Mercedes, etc.) and concluded thus:

      "Instead, Mr. Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx looks up. Of the 100 people richer than he is, fully ten have more than four times his income. And he knows of one person with 20 times his income. He knows who the really rich are, and they have ten times his income: They have not $450,000 a year. They have $4.5 million a year. And, to him, they are in a different world.

      "And so he is sad. He and his wife deserve to be successful. And he knows people who are successful. But he is not one of them--widening income inequality over the past generation has excluded him from the rich who truly have money.

      "And this makes him sad. And angry. But, curiously enough, not angry at the senior law firm partners who extract surplus value from their associates and their clients, or angry at the financiers, but angry at... Barack Obama, who dares to suggest that the U.S. government's funding gap should be closed partly by taxing him, and angry at the great hordes of the unwashed who will receive the Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security payments that the government will make over the next several generations."

      That's your typical Federalist Society member....

      Delete
    5. Notice in chuck's rant, he doesn't dispute even one fact contained in that article, not one! Why? Because they're TRUE!

      You want to see fat cats chuck? Read the article again for a true example of GREED, your precious little Southern Poverty Law Center.

      WHAT HYPOCRITES!!!!!!

      Delete
  18. chuck gregory1/1/19, 8:16 PM

    4:48-- I did read the article, and this is what I have to point out to you about its claims:

    1. SPLC’s Attacks Are Purposefully Personal— Immaterial, if they’re true. If they weren’t true, the parties named could receive lots of compensation in lawsuits.

    2. The Southern Poverty Law Center Is a Scam— A look at the financial reports of other even more respected foundations will reveal similar expenditure patterns. For scams, you have to look at really dodgy operations, like the now extinct Trump Foundation.

    3. The Southern Poverty Law Center Is Deeply Biased— and the only basis for their accusation is an anarchic (no organization, no membership, no spokesmen, no national leader, nothing) group that doesn’t stockpile weapons or promulgate hate literature?

    4. The Southern Poverty Law Center Exploits Hate— and 5. The SPLC Foments Hatred, Fear, and Violence: No, it doesn’t. Read the argument again. To support its claim that the US is the “most racially tolerant country in the world,” the article cites— what else— The Federalist itself. Very telling about the quality of the argument.

    It doesn't say much about the readership if the editors think this sort of reasoning is at their level of intelligence, because a moderately- or well-informed person would be insulted in being expected to accept it.

    ReplyDelete
  19. You're doing well upchuck, only took you over a day to invent your nonsensical reply. I'm sympathetic however. I suppose I'll be feeble-minded some day as well.

    "None so blind as those that will not see"

    Hey, I've come up with a new moniker for you....'THE OSTRICH'

    ReplyDelete
  20. chuck gregory1/2/19, 9:29 AM

    8:04, the proper way to respond with an argument is to use citations which point out the flaws and weaknesses in your opponent's argument. But I am pleased to see you validate my opinion of the readership of the Federalist.

    ReplyDelete


Please keep your comments polite and on-topic. No profanity

R E C E N T . . . C O M M E N T S

Springfield Vermont News is an ongoing zero-income volunteer hyperlocal news gathering project. No paid advertising is accepted on this site but any Springfield business willing to place a link to this news blog on their site will be considered for a free ad here. Businesses, organizations and individuals may submit write-ups and photos about any positive happenings here in Springfield that they are associated with and would be deemed newsworthy. Email the Editor at ed44vt@gmail.com.

Privacy statement: This blog does not share personal information with third parties nor do we store any information about your visit to this blog other than to analyze and optimize your content and reading experience through the use of cookies. You can turn off the use of cookies at anytime by changing your specific browser settings. We are not responsible for republished content from this blog on other blogs or websites without our permission. This privacy policy is subject to change without notice and was last updated on January 1, 2017. If you have any questions feel free to contact Springfield Vermont News directly here: ed44vt@gmail.com

Pageviews past week

---

Sign by Danasoft - For Backgrounds and Layouts